These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38754543)
1. The variability of MCID, SCB, PASS, and MOI thresholds for PROMs in the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review. Yendluri A; Alexanian A; Lee AC; Megafu MN; Levine WN; Parsons BO; Kelly JD; Parisien RL; J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Oct; 33(10):2320-2332. PubMed ID: 38754543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variability of MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds in Studies Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review. Lee AC; Gupta R; Kelly JD; Li X; Parisien RL Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jul; 52(9):2424-2432. PubMed ID: 38318661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stratification of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after total shoulder arthroplasty by implant type, preoperative diagnosis, and sex. Simovitch RW; Elwell J; Colasanti CA; Hao KA; Friedman RJ; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Roche CP; Zuckerman JD J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Sep; 33(9):e492-e506. PubMed ID: 38461936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state. Hao KA; Hones KM; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Burns MQ; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Simovitch RW; Schoch BS; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Oct; 32(10):e516-e527. PubMed ID: 37178967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Substantial Inconsistency and Variability Exists Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences for Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Kolin DA; Moverman MA; Pagani NR; Puzzitiello RN; Dubin J; Menendez ME; Jawa A; Kirsch JM Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jul; 480(7):1371-1383. PubMed ID: 35302970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishing clinically significant outcomes of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity questionnaire after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Haunschild ED; Condron NB; Gilat R; Fu MC; Wolfson T; Garrigues GE; Nicholson G; Forsythe B; Verma N; Cole BJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2231-2239. PubMed ID: 33878484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinically significant outcome thresholds and rates of achievement by shoulder arthroplasty type and preoperative diagnosis. Puzzitiello RN; Moverman MA; Glass EA; Swanson DP; Bowler AR; Le K; Kirsch JM; Lohre R; Jawa A J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jul; 33(7):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 38218402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Establishing clinically significant outcome thresholds for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty. Cohn MR; Kunze KN; Polce EM; Nemsick M; Garrigues GE; Forsythe B; Nicholson GP; Cole BJ; Verma NN J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):e137-e146. PubMed ID: 32711106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty? Werner BC; Chang B; Nguyen JT; Dines DM; Gulotta LV Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2672-2681. PubMed ID: 27392769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state. Issa TZ; Lee Y; Henry TW; Trenchfield D; Schroeder GD; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK Eur Spine J; 2023 Oct; 32(10):3333-3351. PubMed ID: 37642774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High Variability in Standardized Outcome Thresholds of Clinically Important Changes in Shoulder Instability Surgery: A Systematic Review. Pasqualini I; Rossi LA; Pan X; Denard PJ; Scanaliato JP; Levin JM; Dickens JF; Klifto CS; Hurley ET Arthroscopy; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39173689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis. Puzzitiello RN; Gowd AK; Liu JN; Agarwalla A; Verma NN; Forsythe B J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Apr; 28(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 30713060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty achieve clinically significant outcomes faster than those undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Drager J; Polce EM; Fu M; Nemsick M; Huddleston HP; Forsythe B; Nicholson GP; Cole BJ; Verma NN; Garrigues GE J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2523-2532. PubMed ID: 33711501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does achieving clinically important thresholds after first shoulder arthroplasty predict similar outcomes of the contralateral shoulder? Turnbull LM; Hao KA; Srinivasan RC; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Vasilopoulos T; Struk AM; Schoch BS; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Apr; 33(4):880-887. PubMed ID: 37690587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after prior contralateral anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with bilateral primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. Turnbull LM; Hao KA; Bindi VE; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Vasilopoulos T; Struk AM; Schoch BS; King JJ Int Orthop; 2024 Mar; 48(3):801-807. PubMed ID: 38032497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What Is the Accuracy of Three Different Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty? Kumar V; Roche C; Overman S; Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman J; Routman H; Teredesai A Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 32332242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal and substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement. Hao KA; Hones KM; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Turnbull LM; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Simovitch RW; Schoch BS; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Mar; 33(3):593-603. PubMed ID: 37778654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Kim DM; Kim TH; Kholinne E; Park JH; Shin MJ; Kim H; Park D; Jeon IH; Koh KH Am J Sports Med; 2020 Sep; 48(11):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 32813985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability. Scanaliato JP; Green CK; Sandler AB; Hurley ET; Hettrich CM; Parnes N Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jan; 52(1):207-214. PubMed ID: 38164689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying success after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement. Nieboer MJ; Hao KA; Tams C; King JJ; Wright TW; Parsons M; Schoch BS; Simovitch RW J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Dec; 32(12):2501-2507. PubMed ID: 37302621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]