136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38754869)
41. An overview of confounding. Part 1: the concept and how to address it.
Howards PP
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):394-399. PubMed ID: 29341103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders.
Vanderweele TJ; Arah OA
Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21052008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. When measurement errors correlate with truth: surprising effects of nondifferential misclassification.
Wacholder S
Epidemiology; 1995 Mar; 6(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 7742402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Bias in pharmacoepidemiologic studies using secondary health care databases: a scoping review.
Prada-Ramallal G; Takkouche B; Figueiras A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):53. PubMed ID: 30871502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Measurement error is often neglected in medical literature: a systematic review.
Brakenhoff TB; Mitroiu M; Keogh RH; Moons KGM; Groenwold RHH; van Smeden M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():89-97. PubMed ID: 29522827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Bespoke Instruments: A new tool for addressing unmeasured confounders.
Richardson DB; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Mar; 191(5):939-947. PubMed ID: 34907434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.
Colditz GA
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Are We Missing Something Pertinent? A Bias Analysis of Unmeasured Confounding in the Firearm-Suicide Literature.
Miller M; Swanson SA; Azrael D
Epidemiol Rev; 2016; 38(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 26769723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Haneuse S
Med Care; 2016 Apr; 54(4):e23-9. PubMed ID: 24309675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantitative Bias Analysis for a Misclassified Confounder: A Comparison Between Marginal Structural Models and Conditional Models for Point Treatments.
Nab L; Groenwold RHH; van Smeden M; Keogh RH
Epidemiology; 2020 Nov; 31(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 32826524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Validity evaluation of indirect adjustment method for multiple unmeasured confounders: A simulation and empirical study.
Byun G; Kim H; Kim SY; Kim SS; Oh H; Lee JT
Environ Res; 2022 Mar; 204(Pt A):111992. PubMed ID: 34487697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
Chiba Y
Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A comparison of confounder selection and adjustment methods for estimating causal effects using large healthcare databases.
Benasseur I; Talbot D; Durand M; Holbrook A; Matteau A; Potter BJ; Renoux C; Schnitzer ME; Tarride JÉ; Guertin JR
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2022 Apr; 31(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 34953160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Regularized Regression Versus the High-Dimensional Propensity Score for Confounding Adjustment in Secondary Database Analyses.
Franklin JM; Eddings W; Glynn RJ; Schneeweiss S
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 182(7):651-9. PubMed ID: 26233956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
; Le TG; Ngo L; Mehta S; Do VD; Thach TQ; Vu XD; Nguyen DT; Cohen A
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Jun; (169):5-72; discussion 73-83. PubMed ID: 22849236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
