These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38755326)

  • 1. Fracture risk prediction in postmenopausal women from GO Study: the comparison between FRAX, Garvan, and POL-RISK algorithms.
    Pluskiewicz W; Werner A; Bach M; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
    Arch Osteoporos; 2024 May; 19(1):39. PubMed ID: 38755326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal fracture prediction thresholds for therapy onset, established from FRAX and Garvan algorithms: a longitudinal observation of the population representative female cohort from the RAC-OST-POL Study.
    Pluskiewicz W; Werner A; Bach M; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
    Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Nov; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 37973685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Height loss in postmenopausal women-do we need more for fracture risk assessment? Results from the GO Study.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
    Osteoporos Int; 2021 Oct; 32(10):2043-2049. PubMed ID: 33818635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting Fracture Risk in Younger Postmenopausal Women: Comparison of the Garvan and FRAX Risk Calculators in the Women's Health Initiative Study.
    Crandall CJ; Larson J; LaCroix A; Cauley JA; LeBoff MS; Li W; LeBlanc ES; Edwards BJ; Manson JE; Ensrud K
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 34(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 30334182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five-year fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women, using both the POL-RISK calculator and the Garvan nomogram: the Silesia Osteo Active Study.
    Zagórski P; Tabor E; Martela-Tomaszek K; Adamczyk P; Pluskiewicz W
    Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):32. PubMed ID: 33594643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased cortical porosity and reduced cortical thickness of the proximal femur are associated with nonvertebral fracture independent of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and Garvan estimates in postmenopausal women.
    Kral R; Osima M; Borgen TT; Vestgaard R; Richardsen E; Bjørnerem Å
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185363. PubMed ID: 28945789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FRAX calculator and Garvan nomogram in male osteoporotic population.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Franek E; Sewerynek E; Leszczynski P; Wichrowska H; Napiórkowska L; Stuss M; Ptaszek A; Kostyk T; Golba KS; Garbacz W; Drozdzowska B
    Aging Male; 2014 Sep; 17(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 24456527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture risk and fracture prevalence in women from outpatient osteoporosis clinic and subjects from population-based sample: A comparison between GO Study and RAC-OST-POL cohorts.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2023 Jan; 32(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36135818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women.
    Cheung EY; Bow CH; Cheung CL; Soong C; Yeung S; Loong C; Kung A
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Mar; 23(3):871-8. PubMed ID: 21562875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
    Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revised FRAX®-based intervention thresholds for the management of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women in Sri Lanka.
    Lekamwasam S; Chandran M; Subasinghe S
    Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Mar; 14(1):33. PubMed ID: 30850909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Setting the new FRAX reference threshold without bone mineral density in Chinese postmenopausal women.
    Liu S; Chen R; Ding N; Wang Q; Huang M; Liu H; Xie Z; Ou Y; Sheng Z
    J Endocrinol Invest; 2021 Feb; 44(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 32495298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women.
    Bolland MJ; Siu AT; Mason BH; Horne AM; Ames RW; Grey AB; Gamble GD; Reid IR
    J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Feb; 26(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20721930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High fracture probability predicts fractures in a 4-year follow-up in women from the RAC-OST-POL study.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Czekajło A; Grzeszczak W; Drozdzowska B
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Dec; 26(12):2811-20. PubMed ID: 26168766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Possible FRAX-based intervention thresholds for a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women.
    Cheung E; Cheung CL; Kung AW; Tan KC
    Osteoporos Int; 2014 Mar; 25(3):1017-23. PubMed ID: 24196720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The utility of absolute risk prediction using FRAX® and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator in daily practice.
    van Geel TA; Eisman JA; Geusens PP; van den Bergh JP; Center JR; Dinant GJ
    Maturitas; 2014 Feb; 77(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 24287178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX algorithm and Garvan nomogram.
    Sandhu SK; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Pocock NA; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 May; 21(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 19633880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hip Fracture Risk Assessment Tools for Adults Aged 80 Years and Older.
    Ensrud KE; Schousboe JT; Crandall CJ; Leslie WD; Fink HA; Cawthon PM; Kado DM; Lane NE; Cauley JA; Langsetmo L
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418612. PubMed ID: 38941095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Worldwide Fracture Prediction.
    El-Hajj Fuleihan G; Chakhtoura M; Cauley JA; Chamoun N
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):397-424. PubMed ID: 28734709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.