166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38756747)
1. The impact of parental involvement laws on minors seeking abortion services: a systematic review.
Kramer A; Ti A; Travis L; Laboe A; Ochieng WO; Young MR
Health Aff Sch; 2023 Oct; 1(4):qxad045. PubMed ID: 38756747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Judicial bypass for minors post-
Horvath S; Frietsche S
Womens Health (Lond); 2023; 19():17455057231219601. PubMed ID: 38146197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Legislation on contraception and abortion for adolescents.
Roemer R
Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(5):241-51. PubMed ID: 4060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandatory parental involvement in minors' abortions: effects of the laws in Minnesota, Missouri, and Indiana.
Ellertson C
Am J Public Health; 1997 Aug; 87(8):1367-74. PubMed ID: 9279279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Did parental involvement laws grow teeth? The effects of state restrictions on minors' access to abortion.
Myers C; Ladd D
J Health Econ; 2020 May; 71():102302. PubMed ID: 32135395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association Between Restricted Abortion Access and Child Entries Into the Foster Care System.
Adkins S; Talmor N; White MH; Dutton C; O'Donoghue AL
JAMA Pediatr; 2024 Jan; 178(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 37930718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights.
Gaffney A; Himmelstein DU; Dickman S; Myers C; Hemenway D; McCormick D; Woolhandler S
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jun; 6(6):e2315578. PubMed ID: 37289459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Parental Involvement Laws on the Abortion Rate of Minors.
Joyce TJ; Kaestner R; Ward J
Demography; 2020 Feb; 57(1):323-346. PubMed ID: 32030626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fertility-related state laws enacted in 1981.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 7047208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. North Florida Women's Health Services v. State.
Florida. Supreme Court
Wests South Report; 2003; 866():612-74. PubMed ID: 16479690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs.
Riley T; Fiastro AE; Benson LS; Khattar A; Prager S; Godfrey EM
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 May; 7(5):e2413847. PubMed ID: 38809551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of a Parental Notification Requirement on Illinois Minors' Access to and Decision-Making Around Abortion.
Ralph LJ; King E; Belusa E; Foster DG; Brindis CD; Biggs MA
J Adolesc Health; 2018 Mar; 62(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 29248391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
Benshoof J
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
Benshoof J
JAMA; 1993 May; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
Herr A
Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
