These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38757212)
41. Pretreatment (18)F-FDG uptake heterogeneity can predict survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma--a retrospective study. Yang Z; Shi Q; Zhang Y; Pan H; Yao Z; Hu S; Shi W; Zhu B; Zhang Y; Hu C Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jan; 10():4. PubMed ID: 25566697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Lee JW; Kang CM; Choi HJ; Lee WJ; Song SY; Lee JH; Lee JD J Nucl Med; 2014 Jun; 55(6):898-904. PubMed ID: 24711649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prognostic value of preoperative intratumoral FDG uptake heterogeneity in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Lee M; Lee H; Cheon GJ; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS Eur Radiol; 2017 Jan; 27(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 27121932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Fully Automatic Quantitative Measurement of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Thymic Epithelial Tumors Using a Convolutional Neural Network. Han S; Oh JS; Kim YI; Seo SY; Lee GD; Park MJ; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim YH; Kim DK; Park SI; Ryu JS Clin Nucl Med; 2022 Jul; 47(7):590-598. PubMed ID: 35675135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on Hui Z; Wei F; Ren H; Xu W; Ren X J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Oct; 146(10):2595-2605. PubMed ID: 32494919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prognostic role of baseline Albano D; Bosio G; Camoni L; Farina M; Re A; Tucci A; Giubbini R; Bertagna F Hematol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30299563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Correlations of Wang JL; Shi AQ; Fan CC; Wang YZ; Guo GR; Liu JY Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2022 Aug; 44(4):628-635. PubMed ID: 36065696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Li Y; Wu X; Huang Y; Bian D; Jiang L Ann Nucl Med; 2020 May; 34(5):314-321. PubMed ID: 32088884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prognostic value of Lee JR; Almuhaimid TM; Roh JL; Oh JS; Kim SJ; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 118(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 30132891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Hofheinz F; Li Y; Steffen IG; Lin Q; Lili C; Hua W; van den Hoff J; Zschaeck S Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 30949816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prognostic significance of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. Calles-Sastre L; Mucientes-Rasilla J; San-Frutos Llorente LM; Royuela A; Garcia-Espantaleón Navas M; Herrero Gámiz S; Pérez-Medina T Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 30366731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Predictive and prognostic potential of volume-based metabolic variables obtained by a baseline Garcia-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Amo-Salas M; Molina D; Jimenez-Londoño GA; Soriano-Castrejón AM; Pena Pardo FJ; Martínez-González A Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2018; 37(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 29102649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Prognostic value of primary tumor and lymph node volumetric metabolic parameters at pre-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Demirel BB; Gülbahar Ateş S; Atasever Akkaş E; Göksel F; Uçmak G Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2023; 42(6):367-373. PubMed ID: 37391092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prediction of Pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT Parameters on the Outcome of First-Line Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer. Li Y; Liu C; Wang B; Hu X; Gong C; Zhao Y; Xie Y; Zhang Y; Song S; Yang Z; Wang B Int J Gen Med; 2021; 14():1797-1809. PubMed ID: 34007206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prognostic value of pretreatment volume-based quantitative Kitajima K; Doi H; Kuribayashi K; Hashimoto M; Tsuchitani T; Tanooka M; Fukushima K; Nakano T; Hasegawa S; Hirota S Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():176-183. PubMed ID: 28027744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Initial Experience of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Morphologic, Functional, and Metabolic Biomarkers. Lee G; I H; Kim SJ; Pak K; Cho JS; Jeong YJ; Lee CH; Chang S Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 41(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 26284773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The role of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Lee JW; Cho A; Lee JH; Yun M; Lee JD; Kim YT; Kang WJ Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Oct; 41(10):1898-906. PubMed ID: 24852188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Could semiquantitative FDG analysis add information to the prognosis in patients with stage II/III breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant treatment? Evangelista L; Cervino AR; Ghiotto C; Saibene T; Michieletto S; Fernando B; Orvieto E; Guarneri V; Conte P Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1648-1655. PubMed ID: 26025244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by Chang H; Lee SJ; Lim J; Lee JS; Kim YJ; Lee WW J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 145(5):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 30900157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of metabolic response with Segreto S; Fonti R; Ottaviano M; Pellegrino S; Pace L; Damiano V; Palmieri G; Del Vecchio S Cancer Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28264726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]