These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38757909)

  • 1. Result of the left bundle branch area pacing data collection registry, an international multicenter study of conduction system pacing with a Tendril STS 2088 stylet-driven lead.
    Vijayaraman P; Foo D; Lim TSE; Diamantakos E; Verma S; Hourdain J; Pandurangi U; Bhargava K; Zanon F; Stone J; Lee K; Nair D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1452-1460. PubMed ID: 38757909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing.
    Vijayaraman P; Subzposh FA; Naperkowski A; Panikkath R; John K; Mascarenhas V; Bauch TD; Huang W
    Heart Rhythm; 2019 Dec; 16(12):1774-1782. PubMed ID: 31136869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Result of the Physiologic Pacing Registry, an international multicenter prospective observational study of conduction system pacing.
    Vazquez PM; Mohamed U; Zanon F; Lustgarten DL; Atwater B; Whinnett ZI; Curila K; Dinerman J; Molina-Lerma M; Wiley J; Grammatico A; Lee K; Vijayaraman P
    Heart Rhythm; 2023 Dec; 20(12):1617-1625. PubMed ID: 37348800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial experience of left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven pacing leads: A multicenter study.
    De Pooter J; Ozpak E; Calle S; Peytchev P; Heggermont W; Marchandise S; Provenier F; Francois B; Anné W; Pollet P; Barbraud C; Gillis K; Timmermans F; Van Heuverswyn F; Tung R; Wauters A; le Polain de Waroux JB
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1540-1549. PubMed ID: 35598298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Left bundle branch area pacing outcomes: the multicentre European MELOS study.
    Jastrzębski M; Kiełbasa G; Cano O; Curila K; Heckman L; De Pooter J; Chovanec M; Rademakers L; Huybrechts W; Grieco D; Whinnett ZI; Timmer SAJ; Elvan A; Stros P; Moskal P; Burri H; Zanon F; Vernooy K
    Eur Heart J; 2022 Oct; 43(40):4161-4173. PubMed ID: 35979843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Left bundle branch area pacing using a stylet-driven, retractable-helix lead: Short-term results from a prospective multicenter IDE trial (the BIO-CONDUCT study).
    Liu CF; Prasad KV; Moretta A; Vijayaraman P; Zanon F; Gleva M; De Pooter J; Chinitz LA;
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38772432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary experience of permanent left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-directed pacing lead without delivery sheath.
    Sun Y; Yao X; Zhou X; Jiang C; Zhang J; Sheng X; Wang M; Yang Y; Pan Y; Su L; Chen X; Fu G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Aug; 45(8):993-1003. PubMed ID: 35437783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Zwolle experience with left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven active fixation leads.
    Daniëls F; Adiyaman A; Aarnink KM; Oosterwerff FJ; Verbakel JRA; Ghani A; Smit JJJ; Kanters MA; Delnoy PPHM; Elvan A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 112(12):1738-1747. PubMed ID: 35716195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rescue left bundle branch area pacing in coronary venous lead failure or nonresponse to biventricular pacing: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.
    Vijayaraman P; Herweg B; Verma A; Sharma PS; Batul SA; Ponnusamy SS; Schaller RD; Cano O; Molina-Lerma M; Curila K; Huybrechts W; Wilson DR; Rademakers LM; Sreekumar P; Upadhyay G; Vernooy K; Subzposh FA; Huang W; Jastrzebski M; Ellenbogen KA
    Heart Rhythm; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1272-1280. PubMed ID: 35504539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven pacing leads with a new delivery sheath: A comparison with lumen-less leads.
    De Pooter J; Calle S; Timmermans F; Van Heuverswyn F
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Feb; 32(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 33355969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: Results from the Geisinger-Rush Conduction System Pacing Registry.
    Sharma PS; Patel NR; Ravi V; Zalavadia DV; Dommaraju S; Garg V; Larsen TR; Naperkowski AM; Wasserlauf J; Krishnan K; Young W; Pokharel P; Oren JW; Storm RH; Trohman RG; Huang HD; Subzposh FA; Vijayaraman P
    Heart Rhythm; 2022 Jan; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 34481985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
    Padala SK; Master VM; Terricabras M; Chiocchini A; Garg A; Kron J; Shepard R; Kalahasty G; Azizi Z; Tsang B; Khaykin Y; Pantano A; Koneru JN; Ellenbogen KA; Verma A
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Dec; 6(14):1773-1782. PubMed ID: 33357573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with atrioventricular conduction disease: A prospective multicenter study.
    Raymond-Paquin A; Verma A; Kolominsky J; Sanchez-Somonte P; Gul EE; Pillai A; Kron J; Shepard R; Kalahasty G; Tsang B; Khaykin Y; Pantano A; Koneru JN; Ellenbogen KA
    Heart Rhythm; 2022 Sep; 19(9):1484-1490. PubMed ID: 35562056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long term performance and safety of His bundle pacing: A multicenter experience.
    Zanon F; Abdelrahman M; Marcantoni L; Naperkowski A; Subzposh FA; Pastore G; Baracca E; Boaretto G; Raffagnato P; Tiribello A; Dandamudi G; Vijayaraman P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1594-1601. PubMed ID: 31310410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Permanent left bundle branch area pacing utilizing intracardiac echocardiogram.
    Feng XF; Zhang PP; Liu B; Zhao Y; Lu QF; Li YG
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Aug; 20(1):377. PubMed ID: 32811431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.
    Vijayaraman P; Ponnusamy S; Cano Ó; Sharma PS; Naperkowski A; Subsposh FA; Moskal P; Bednarek A; Dal Forno AR; Young W; Nanda S; Beer D; Herweg B; Jastrzebski M
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Feb; 7(2):135-147. PubMed ID: 33602393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practical and systematic approach using the steerable catheter and stylet-driven lead to deliver safe and effective left bundle branch area pacing.
    Foo D; Tan K; Ng S; Tan LW; Chia PL
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Sep; 34(9):1944-1950. PubMed ID: 37565366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lead performance of stylet-driven leads in left bundle branch area pacing: Results from a large single-center cohort and insights from in vitro bench testing.
    Özpak E; Van Heuverswyn F; Timmermans F; De Pooter J
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Jun; 21(6):865-873. PubMed ID: 38307309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications of left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing in candidates for resynchronization therapy: Results of a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter registry.
    Palmisano P; Dell'Era G; Guerra F; Ammendola E; Ziacchi M; Laffi M; Donateo P; Guido A; Ghiglieno C; Parlavecchio A; Dello Russo A; Nigro G; Biffi M; Gaggioli G; Senes J; Patti G; Accogli M; Coluccia G
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Jun; 21(6):874-880. PubMed ID: 38428448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-Analysis Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus His Bundle Pacing.
    Yuan Z; Cheng L; Wu Y
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 164():64-72. PubMed ID: 34887071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.