These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38758627)

  • 1. In vivo demonstration of a real-time temporal SNR acoustic output adjustment method.
    Huber MT; Bradway DP; McNally PJ; Ellestad SC; Trahey GE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2024 May; PP():. PubMed ID: 38758627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Automated ALARA Method for Ultrasound: An Obstetric Ultrasound Feasibility Study.
    Flint K; Bottenus N; Bradway D; McNally P; Ellestad S; Trahey G
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 33289152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human Observer Sensitivity to Temporal Noise During B-Mode Ultrasound Scanning: Characterization and Imaging Implications.
    Huber MT; Flint KM; McNally PJ; Ellestad SC; Trahey GE
    Ultrason Imaging; 2024 May; 46(3):151-163. PubMed ID: 38497455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Automated Region-Selection Method for Adaptive ALARA Ultrasound Imaging.
    Flint KM; Barre EC; Huber MT; McNally PJ; Ellestad SC; Trahey GE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Jul; 69(7):2257-2269. PubMed ID: 35507609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP; Qiu XY; Mou HY; Xi X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA; Arora K
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Benefit of Elevated Acoustic Output in Harmonic Motion Estimation in Ultrasonic Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging.
    Deng Y; Palmeri ML; Rouze NC; Haystead CM; Nightingale KR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 44(2):303-310. PubMed ID: 29169880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Temporal Processing Abilities in Competing Noise.
    Saxena U; Damarla V; Kumar SBR; Chacko G
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Dec; 74(Suppl 3):3604-3609. PubMed ID: 36742707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. M-sequence-coded excitation for magneto-acoustic imaging.
    Zhang S; Ma R; Yin T; Liu Z
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 May; 57(5):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 30569398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Obstetrical ultrasound: can the fetus hear the wave and feel the heat?].
    Abramowicz JS; Kremkau FW; Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 22700164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise suppression-guided image filtering for low-SNR CT reconstruction.
    He Y; Zeng L; Yu W; Gong C
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Nov; 58(11):2621-2629. PubMed ID: 32839918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SNR-dependent coherence-based adaptive imaging for high-frame-rate ultrasonic and photoacoustic imaging.
    Wang YH; Li PC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Aug; 61(8):1419-32. PubMed ID: 25073148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Stangl E
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 23334355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of ultrasound synthetic aperture imaging using bidirectional pixel-based focusing: preliminary phantom and in vivo breast study.
    Kim C; Yoon C; Park JH; Lee Y; Kim WH; Chang JM; Choi BI; Song TK; Yoo YM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2716-24. PubMed ID: 23686939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A wavelet-based method for improving signal-to-noise ratio and contrast in MR images.
    Alexander ME; Baumgartner R; Summers AR; Windischberger C; Klarhoefer M; Moser E; Somorjai RL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Feb; 18(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 10722977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise-robust acoustic signature recognition using nonlinear Hebbian learning.
    Lu B; Dibazar A; Berger TW
    Neural Netw; 2010 Dec; 23(10):1252-63. PubMed ID: 20655704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptable Noise Levels and Preferred Signal-to-noise Ratios for Speech and Music.
    Lee D; Lewis JD; Johnstone PM; Plyler PN
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1013-1022. PubMed ID: 34759206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.