130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38759243)
1. Comparison of transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion outcomes in patients receiving a novel allograft versus rhBMP-2: a radiographic and patient-reported outcomes analysis.
Hani U; Farber SH; Pfortmiller D; Kim PK; Bohl MA; Holland CM; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 May; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38759243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Allogeneic morphogenetic protein vs. recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a radiographic and economic analysis.
Roh JS; Yeung CA; Field JS; McClellan RT
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 8():49. PubMed ID: 24373225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial comparing PEEK and allograft spacers in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgeries.
Villavicencio AT; Nelson EL; Rajpal S; Beasley K; Burneikiene S
Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 34116214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes.
Slosar PJ; Josey R; Reynolds J
Spine J; 2007; 7(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 17482113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and Patient-reported Outcomes After Posterior Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-A Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study on 422 Patients with 2-year Follow-up.
Ohrt-Nissen S; Carreon LY; Andresen AK; Andersen MØ; Udby P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Jan; 47(2):180-185. PubMed ID: 34474454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased incidence of pseudarthrosis after unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spondylosis: Clinical article.
Gologorsky Y; Skovrlj B; Steinberger J; Moore M; Arginteanu M; Moore F; Steinberger A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 25084031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 versus local bone graft in primary lumbar interbody fusions.
Adams CL; Ogden K; Robertson IK; Broadhurst S; Edis D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 24153173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with either a cellular bone allograft containing multipotent adult progenitor cells or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.
Lee DD; Kim JY
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Aug; 12(1):126. PubMed ID: 28841904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anterolateral versus posterior minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery for spondylolisthesis: comparison of outcomes from a global, multicenter study at 12-months follow-up.
Pereira P; Park Y; Arzoglou V; Charles YP; Krutko A; Senker W; Park SW; Franke J; Fuentes S; Bordon G; Song Y; He S; Vialle E; Mlyavykh S; Varanda P; Hosszu T; Bhagat S; Hong JY; Vanhauwaert D; de la Dehesa P
Spine J; 2023 Oct; 23(10):1494-1505. PubMed ID: 37236367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of TLIF with rhBMP-2 versus no TLIF and higher posterolateral rhBMP-2 dose at L5-S1 for long fusions to the sacrum with sacropelvic fixation in patients with primary adult deformity.
Rahman RK; Buchowski JM; Stephens B; Dorward IG; Koester LA; Bridwell KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2264-71. PubMed ID: 24108280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of safety and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases.
Chen M; Cui J; Liu Y; Cai Z; Yang C; Liu H; Chen Y; Yao Z
J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):95. PubMed ID: 38287376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion outcomes in patients receiving rhBMP-2 versus autograft.
Khan TR; Pearce KR; McAnany SJ; Peters CM; Gupta MC; Zebala LP
Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):439-446. PubMed ID: 28822825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).
Rathbone J; Rackham M; Nielsen D; Lee SM; Hing W; Riar S; Scott-Young M
Eur Spine J; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1911-1926. PubMed ID: 37071155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of surgical intervention for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative analysis of different surgical fixation techniques.
Jadhakhan F; Bell D; Rushton A
J Spine Surg; 2023 Mar; 9(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 37038424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
