These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38760923)

  • 1. Response: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Porcari I; Zorzato PC; Bosco M; Garzon S; Uccella S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):470-471. PubMed ID: 38760923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter to the Editor: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Husby KR; Klarskov N
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):468-469. PubMed ID: 38736316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Porcari I; Zorzato PC; Bosco M; Garzon S; Magni F; Salvatore S; Franchi MP; Uccella S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):173-189. PubMed ID: 38269852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dutch women's attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    van IJsselmuiden MN; Detollenaere RJ; Gerritse MBE; Kluivers KB; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven HWF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jan; 220():79-83. PubMed ID: 29175132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
    Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Balk EM; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):505-522. PubMed ID: 30741318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
    Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift™ mesh.
    Huang LY; Chu LC; Chiang HJ; Chuang FC; Kung FT; Huang KH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1013-20. PubMed ID: 25600353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do patients and surgeons decide on uterine preservation or hysterectomy in apical prolapse?
    Anglim B; O'Sullivan O; O'Reilly B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1075-1079. PubMed ID: 29947819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.
    Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
    Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):28-34. PubMed ID: 29673691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
    Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review.
    Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pelvic organ prolapse patients' attitudes and preferences regarding their uterus: comparing German- and Russian-speaking women.
    Lyatoshinsky P; Fünfgeld C; Popov A; Bezhenar V; Krutova V; Ulrich D; Umek W
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2077-2083. PubMed ID: 31028419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of concurrent vaginal hysterectomy in the outcomes of mesh-based vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Forde JC; Chughtai B; Anger JT; Mao J; Sedrakyan A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1183-1195. PubMed ID: 28091710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a survey of female gynecologists (POP-UP survey).
    Urdzík P; Kalis V; Blaganje M; Rusavy Z; Smazinka M; Havir M; Dudič R; Ismail KM
    BMC Womens Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):241. PubMed ID: 33109157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
    Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Korbly NB; Kassis NC; Good MM; Richardson ML; Book NM; Yip S; Saguan D; Gross C; Evans J; Lopes VV; Harvie HS; Sung VW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 209(5):470.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23921090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and validation of the Value of Uterus instrument and visual analog scale to measure patients' valuation of their uterus.
    Chang OH; Walters MD; Yao M; Lapin B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 227(5):746.e1-746.e9. PubMed ID: 35764134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.