These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38761011)

  • 41. Comparison of Various Nuclear Localization Signal-Fused Cas9 Proteins and
    Hu P; Zhao X; Zhang Q; Li W; Zu Y
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Mar; 8(3):823-831. PubMed ID: 29295818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Anti-CRISPR proteins targeting the CRISPR-Cas system enrich the toolkit for genetic engineering.
    Liu Q; Zhang H; Huang X
    FEBS J; 2020 Feb; 287(4):626-644. PubMed ID: 31730297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. CRISPR-Cas9 assisted non-homologous end joining genome editing system of Halomonas bluephagenesis for large DNA fragment deletion.
    Liu C; Yue Y; Xue Y; Zhou C; Ma Y
    Microb Cell Fact; 2023 Oct; 22(1):211. PubMed ID: 37838676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Long-read sequence analysis of MMEJ-mediated CRISPR genome editing reveals complex on-target vector insertions that may escape standard PCR-based quality control.
    Higashitani Y; Horie K
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11652. PubMed ID: 37468545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based plant genomic fragment deletions by microhomology-mediated end joining.
    Tan J; Zhao Y; Wang B; Hao Y; Wang Y; Li Y; Luo W; Zong W; Li G; Chen S; Ma K; Xie X; Chen L; Liu YG; Zhu Q
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2020 Nov; 18(11):2161-2163. PubMed ID: 32336015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Salt and osmotic stress can improve the editing efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing system in potato.
    Ye M; Yao M; Li C; Gong M
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15771. PubMed ID: 37547711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Precision genome editing in the CRISPR era.
    Salsman J; Dellaire G
    Biochem Cell Biol; 2017 Apr; 95(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 28177771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated correction of human genetic disease.
    Men K; Duan X; He Z; Yang Y; Yao S; Wei Y
    Sci China Life Sci; 2017 May; 60(5):447-457. PubMed ID: 28534256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9: Can It Get Any Better?
    Haeussler M; Concordet JP
    J Genet Genomics; 2016 May; 43(5):239-50. PubMed ID: 27210042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Optimization of T4 phage engineering via CRISPR/Cas9.
    Duong MM; Carmody CM; Ma Q; Peters JE; Nugen SR
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18229. PubMed ID: 33106580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. CRISPR/Cas: A powerful tool for gene function study and crop improvement.
    Zhang D; Zhang Z; Unver T; Zhang B
    J Adv Res; 2021 Mar; 29():207-221. PubMed ID: 33842017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat.
    Kim D; Alptekin B; Budak H
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2018 Jan; 18(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 28918562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Endogenous CRISPR-assisted microhomology-mediated end joining enables rapid genome editing in Zymomonas mobilis.
    Sui X; Wang X; Liu T; Ye Q; Wu B; Hu G; Yang S; He M; Peng N
    Biotechnol Biofuels; 2021 Oct; 14(1):208. PubMed ID: 34689795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Various Aspects of a Gene Editing System-CRISPR-Cas9.
    Janik E; Niemcewicz M; Ceremuga M; Krzowski L; Saluk-Bijak J; Bijak M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(24):. PubMed ID: 33339441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9
    Ma JX; He WY; Hua HM; Zhu Q; Zheng GS; Zimin AA; Wang WF; Lu YH
    ACS Synth Biol; 2023 Oct; 12(10):3114-3123. PubMed ID: 37722085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in approaches in zebrafish.
    Albadri S; Del Bene F; Revenu C
    Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():77-85. PubMed ID: 28300641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative analysis of lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 RNP versus mRNA/sgRNA for gene editing in vitro and in vivo.
    Walther J; Porenta D; Wilbie D; Seinen C; Benne N; Yang Q; de Jong OG; Lei Z; Mastrobattista E
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2024 Mar; 196():114207. PubMed ID: 38325664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Exploiting endogenous CRISPR-Cas system for multiplex genome editing in Clostridium tyrobutyricum and engineer the strain for high-level butanol production.
    Zhang J; Zong W; Hong W; Zhang ZT; Wang Y
    Metab Eng; 2018 May; 47():49-59. PubMed ID: 29530750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Simplified CRISPR-Mediated DNA Editing in Multicellular Eukaryotes.
    Kumar R; Tiwari K; Saudagar P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2575():241-260. PubMed ID: 36301478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Phage AcrIIA2 DNA Mimicry: Structural Basis of the CRISPR and Anti-CRISPR Arms Race.
    Liu L; Yin M; Wang M; Wang Y
    Mol Cell; 2019 Feb; 73(3):611-620.e3. PubMed ID: 30606466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.