These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38762655)

  • 1. Prosocial emotions predict individual differences in economic decision-making during ultimatum game with dynamic reciprocal contexts.
    Kim J; Bong SH; Yoon D; Jeong B
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11397. PubMed ID: 38762655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Saliency modulates affective evaluations but not behavioral responses in the ultimatum game.
    Liu C; Chai J; Yu R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():99-107. PubMed ID: 29331200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision-making in social contexts in youth with ADHD.
    Ma I; Lambregts-Rommelse NN; Buitelaar JK; Cillessen AH; Scheres AP
    Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2017 Mar; 26(3):335-344. PubMed ID: 27553218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lower dorsal striatum activation in association with neuroticism during the acceptance of unfair offers.
    Servaas MN; Aleman A; Marsman JB; Renken RJ; Riese H; Ormel J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 25720857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    Sanfey AG; Rilling JK; Aronson JA; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1755-8. PubMed ID: 12805551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of emotion regulation and choice repetition bias in the ultimatum game.
    Chung JCY; Bhatoa RS; Kirkpatrick R; Woodcock KA
    Emotion; 2023 Jun; 23(4):925-936. PubMed ID: 36048029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Takagishi H; Shinada M; Tanida S; Cook KS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jul; 106(28):11520-3. PubMed ID: 19564602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of depression on social economic decision making.
    Harlé KM; Allen JJ; Sanfey AG
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2010 May; 119(2):440-6. PubMed ID: 20455617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do different fairness contexts and facial emotions motivate 'irrational' social decision-making in major depression? An exploratory patient study.
    Radke S; Schäfer IC; Müller BW; de Bruijn ER
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Dec; 210(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 23910237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of emotion regulation on social interactive decision-making.
    van't Wout M; Chang LJ; Sanfey AG
    Emotion; 2010 Dec; 10(6):815-21. PubMed ID: 21171756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of self-esteem on social interactions during the Ultimatum Game.
    Paz V; Nicolaisen-Sobesky E; Collado E; Horta S; Rey C; Rivero M; Berriolo P; Díaz M; Otón M; Pérez A; Fernández-Theoduloz G; Cabana Á; Gradin VB
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Jun; 252():247-255. PubMed ID: 28285253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiac responses predict decisions: an investigation of the relation between orienting response and decisions in the ultimatum game.
    Osumi T; Ohira H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 19646490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others?
    van 't Wout M; Faught S; Menino D
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():880. PubMed ID: 24348438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disentangling self- and fairness-related neural mechanisms involved in the ultimatum game: an fMRI study.
    Corradi-Dell'Acqua C; Civai C; Rumiati RI; Fink GR
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 8(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 22287263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.
    Yamagishi T; Matsumoto Y; Kiyonari T; Takagishi H; Li Y; Kanai R; Sakagami M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):6394-6399. PubMed ID: 28559334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.