These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38763063)

  • 1. Abolition of coercion in mental health services - A European survey of feasibility.
    Birkeland S; Steinert T; Whittington R; Gildberg FA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 94():101992. PubMed ID: 38763063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in opinions on coercion use among mental healthcare professionals: a questionnaire study.
    Birkeland S; Bogh SB; Pedersen ML; Kerring JH; Morsø L; Tingleff EB; Gildberg FA
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2024 Jul; 78(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 38626028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A descriptive survey study of violence management and priorities among psychiatric staff in mental health services, across seventeen european countries.
    Cowman S; Björkdahl A; Clarke E; Gethin G; Maguire J;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):59. PubMed ID: 28103871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coercion in psychiatric care: can paternalism justify coercion?
    Seo MK; Kim SH; Rhee M
    Int J Soc Psychiatry; 2013 May; 59(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 22222850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antipsychotic treatment of psychotic disorders in forensic psychiatry: Patients' perception of coercion and its predictors.
    Horvath J; Steinert T; Jaeger S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 57():113-121. PubMed ID: 29548498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accumulated coercion and short-term outcome of inpatient psychiatric care.
    Kjellin L; Wallsten T
    BMC Psychiatry; 2010 Jun; 10():53. PubMed ID: 20584301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients.
    Hotzy F; Moetteli S; Theodoridou A; Schneeberger AR; Seifritz E; Hoff P; Jäger M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2018; 148():w14616. PubMed ID: 29698543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Criteria for involuntary psychiatric admission – changes from 1848 until today].
    Øvregard MDS; Lie AK
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2020 Mar; 140(5):. PubMed ID: 32238957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Coercion Experience Scale" (CES)--validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures.
    Bergk J; Flammer E; Steinert T
    BMC Psychiatry; 2010 Jan; 10():5. PubMed ID: 20074355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in patterns of coercion during a nine-year period in a Norwegian psychiatric service area.
    Lassemo E; Myklebust LH
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2021 Dec; 30(4):e1889. PubMed ID: 34297449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice in the involuntary admission and future engagement with mental health services.
    O'Donoghue B; Lyne J; Hill M; Larkin C; Feeney L; O'Callaghan E
    Eur Psychiatry; 2011 May; 26(4):208-14. PubMed ID: 20538433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public attitudes towards involuntary admission and treatment by mental health services in Norway.
    Joa I; Hustoft K; Anda LG; Brønnick K; Nielssen O; Johannessen JO; Langeveld JH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 55():1-7. PubMed ID: 29157507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of coercive measures during involuntary hospitalization: findings from ten European countries.
    Raboch J; Kalisová L; Nawka A; Kitzlerová E; Onchev G; Karastergiou A; Magliano L; Dembinskas A; Kiejna A; Torres-Gonzales F; Kjellin L; Priebe S; Kallert TW
    Psychiatr Serv; 2010 Oct; 61(10):1012-7. PubMed ID: 20889640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' attitudes towards and acceptance of coercion in psychiatry.
    Krieger E; Moritz S; Weil R; Nagel M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Feb; 260():478-485. PubMed ID: 29287276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors associated with involuntary hospitalisation for psychiatric patients in Switzerland: a retrospective study.
    Silva B; Golay P; Morandi S
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Dec; 18(1):401. PubMed ID: 30594163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective experience of coercion in psychiatric care: a study comparing the attitudes of patients and healthy volunteers towards coercive methods and their justification.
    Mielau J; Altunbay J; Gallinat J; Heinz A; Bermpohl F; Lehmann A; Montag C
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 266(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 25900468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coercion in psychiatry: the importance of extramural factors.
    Andersen K; Nielsen B
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2016 Nov; 70(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 27286476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study.
    Lickiewicz J; Efkemann SA; Husum TL; Lantta T; Pingani L; Whittington R
    Front Psychiatry; 2024; 15():1403094. PubMed ID: 38868490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Admission Experience Survey Italian Version (I-AES): A factor analytic study on a sample of 156 acute psychiatric in-patients.
    Mandarelli G; Parmigiani G; Trobia F; Tessari G; Roma P; Biondi M; Ferracuti S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 62():111-116. PubMed ID: 30616845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quasi-experimental comparison of coercive interventions on client outcomes in individuals with severe and persistent mental illness.
    Galon P; Wineman NM
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2011 Dec; 25(6):404-18. PubMed ID: 22114795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.