These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38763378)

  • 1. Cost, efficiency, and outcomes of pulsed field ablation vs thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A real-world study.
    Calvert P; Mills MT; Xydis P; Essa H; Ding WY; Koniari I; Farinha JM; Harding M; Mahida S; Snowdon R; Waktare J; Borbas Z; Modi S; Todd D; Ashrafi R; Luther V; Gupta D
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Sep; 21(9):1537-1544. PubMed ID: 38763378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cost-consequence analysis comparing three cardiac ablation strategies for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    van de Kar M; Dekker L; Timmermanns I; Della Rocca D; Chierchia GB; Da Riis-Vestergaard L; Uffenorde S; Morgan J; Chun J
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):826-835. PubMed ID: 38889094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulsed-field vs cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation: Outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Kueffer T; Stettler R; Maurhofer J; Madaffari A; Stefanova A; Iqbal SUR; Thalmann G; Kozhuharov NA; Galuszka O; Servatius H; Haeberlin A; Noti F; Tanner H; Roten L; Reichlin T
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Aug; 21(8):1227-1235. PubMed ID: 38614191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulsed electric field, cryoballoon, and radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a propensity score-matched comparison.
    Della Rocca DG; Marcon L; Magnocavallo M; Menè R; Pannone L; Mohanty S; Sousonis V; Sorgente A; Almorad A; Bisignani A; Głowniak A; Del Monte A; Bala G; Polselli M; Mouram S; La Fazia VF; Ströker E; Gianni C; Zeriouh S; Bianchi S; Sieira J; Combes S; Sarkozy A; Rossi P; Boveda S; Natale A; de Asmundis C; Chierchia GB;
    Europace; 2023 Dec; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 38245007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pulsed Field Versus Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Follow-Up in a 400-Patient Cohort.
    Urbanek L; Bordignon S; Schaack D; Chen S; Tohoku S; Efe TH; Ebrahimi R; Pansera F; Hirokami J; Plank K; Koch A; Schulte-Hahn B; Schmidt B; Chun KJ
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2023 Jul; 16(7):389-398. PubMed ID: 37254781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Autonomic Effects of Pulsed Field vs Thermal Ablation for Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of ADVENT.
    Gerstenfeld EP; Mansour M; Whang W; Venkateswaran R; Harding JD; Ellis CR; Ellenbogen KA; Osorio J; DeLurgio DB; Daccarett M; Mangrum M; McElderry T; Richards E; Albrecht EM; Schneider CW; Sutton BS; Reddy VY
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2024 Jul; 10(7 Pt 2):1634-1644. PubMed ID: 38869507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation vs. novel cryoballoon ablation system for atrial fibrillation.
    Badertscher P; Weidlich S; Knecht S; Stauffer N; Krisai P; Voellmin G; Osswald S; Sticherling C; Kühne M
    Europace; 2023 Dec; 25(12):. PubMed ID: 38036293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of pulsed field ablation and cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation.
    Schipper JH; Steven D; Lüker J; Wörmann J; van den Bruck JH; Filipovic K; Dittrich S; Scheurlen C; Erlhöfer S; Pavel F; Sultan A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Oct; 34(10):2019-2026. PubMed ID: 37682001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early experience with the cryoablation balloon procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation by an experienced radiofrequency catheter ablation center.
    Mandell J; Amico F; Parekh S; Snow J; Germano J; Cohen TJ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 25(6):288-92. PubMed ID: 23735354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulsed-field versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation-Impact of energy source on sedation and analgesia requirement.
    Wahedi R; Willems S; Feldhege J; Jularic M; Hartmann J; Anwar O; Dickow J; Harloff T; Gessler N; Gunawardene MA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2024 Jan; 35(1):162-170. PubMed ID: 38009545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation vs. high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up (PRIORI study).
    Reinsch N; Füting A; Hartl S; Höwel D; Rausch E; Lin Y; Kasparian K; Neven K
    Europace; 2024 Jul; 26(7):. PubMed ID: 38996227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulsed field vs very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of a multicenter, real-world experience.
    Dello Russo A; Compagnucci P; Anselmino M; Schillaci V; Campanelli F; Ascione MR; Volpato G; Cipolletta L; Parisi Q; Valeri Y; D'Angelo L; Chiariello P; Casella M; Solimene F
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Sep; 21(9):1526-1536. PubMed ID: 38810922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulsed field ablation with the pentaspline catheter compared with cryoablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the UK NHS: a cost-comparison analysis.
    Duxbury C; Begley D; Heck PM
    BMJ Open; 2024 May; 14(5):e079881. PubMed ID: 38724059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using the Second-Generation Cryoballoon versus Open-Irrigated Radiofrequency: A Multicenter Experience.
    Aryana A; Singh SM; Kowalski M; Pujara DK; Cohen AI; Singh SK; Aleong RG; Banker RS; Fuenzalida CE; Prager NA; Bowers MR; D'Avila A; O'Neill PG
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):832-839. PubMed ID: 25917655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lattice-Tip Focal Ablation Catheter That Toggles Between Radiofrequency and Pulsed Field Energy to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: A First-in-Human Trial.
    Reddy VY; Anter E; Rackauskas G; Peichl P; Koruth JS; Petru J; Funasako M; Minami K; Natale A; Jais P; Nakagawa H; Marinskis G; Aidietis A; Kautzner J; Neuzil P
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 13(6):e008718. PubMed ID: 32383391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pulmonary vein narrowing after pulsed field versus thermal ablation.
    Mansour M; Gerstenfeld EP; Patel C; Natale A; Whang W; Cuoco FA; Mountantonakis SE; Gibson DN; Harding JD; Holland SK; Achyutha AB; Schneider CW; Mugglin AS; Albrecht EM; Stein KM; Lehmann JW; Reddy VY
    Europace; 2024 Feb; 26(2):. PubMed ID: 38305503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter Versus Cryoballoon for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results From a Prospective Comparative Study.
    Chaumont C; Hayoun C; Savoure A; Al Hamoud R; Auquier N; McDonnell E; Eltchaninoff H; Anselme F
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Mar; 13(6):e033146. PubMed ID: 38471838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Newer generation cryoballoon vs. contact force-sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter in the ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Ali AN; Riad O; Tawfik M; Opel A; Wong T
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2021 Jun; 32(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 33999265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Maurhofer J; Kueffer T; Madaffari A; Stettler R; Stefanova A; Seiler J; Thalmann G; Kozhuharov N; Galuszka O; Servatius H; Haeberlin A; Noti F; Tanner H; Roten L; Reichlin T
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2024 Mar; 67(2):389-397. PubMed ID: 37776355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using a second-generation cryoballoon catheter or contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter: A comparison of costs and long-term clinical outcomes.
    Yokokawa M; Chugh A; Latchamsetty R; Ghanbari H; Crawford T; Jongnarangsin K; Cunnane R; Saeed M; Hornsby K; Krishnasamy K; Lohawijarn W; Keast R; Karpenko D; Bogun F; Pelosi F; Morady F; Oral H
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 29071765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.