These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38763387)
1. The influence of radiographic marker registration versus a markerless trace registration method on the implant placement accuracy achieved by dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery. An in-vitro study. Jorba-García A; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105072. PubMed ID: 38763387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study. Jorba-García A; Ruiz-Romero V; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105150. PubMed ID: 38909646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: An in vitro study. Ruiz-Romero V; Jorba-Garcia A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105290. PubMed ID: 39106900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of dental implant placement with or without the use of a dynamic navigation assisted system: A randomized clinical trial. Jorba-García A; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 May; 34(5):438-449. PubMed ID: 36794798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jorba-García A; González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 33635397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study. Ma F; Sun F; Wei T; Ma Y Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 35536921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study. Younis H; Lv C; Xu B; Zhou H; Du L; Liao L; Zhao N; Long W; Elayah SA; Chang X; He L Head Face Med; 2024 May; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 38745297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Struwe M; Leontiev W; Connert T; Kühl S; Filippi A; Herber V; Dagassan-Berndt D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Mar; 34(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 36626272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation. Böse MWH; Beuer F; Schwitalla A; Bruhnke M; Herklotz I J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104265. PubMed ID: 35995082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and safety of a haptic operated and machine vision controlled collaborative robot for dental implant placement: A translational study. Qiao SC; Wu XY; Shi JY; Tonetti MS; Lai HC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Aug; 34(8):839-849. PubMed ID: 37309242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years. Yu X; Tao B; Wang F; Wu Y J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104567. PubMed ID: 37263412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study. Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the number and distribution of fiducial markers on the accuracy of robot-guided implant surgery in edentulous mandibular arches: An in vitro study. Zhao Y; Liao Y; Wu X; Zhang Y; Shi B; Yan Q J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104529. PubMed ID: 37105431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Accuracy of two different registration methods of dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement]. Ma FF; Wei T; Sun F; Ma Y Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 57(12):1225-1229. PubMed ID: 36509522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and patient-centered results of marker-based and marker-free registrations for dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Zhu J; Sun W; Li L; Li H; Zou Y; Huang B; Ji W; Shi B Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 37955359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study. Wang XY; Liu L; Guan MS; Liu Q; Zhao T; Li HB J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104240. PubMed ID: 35872224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impacts of registration-and-fixation device positioning on the performance of implant placement assisted by dynamic computer-aided surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Wu BZ; Sun F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Apr; 35(4):386-395. PubMed ID: 38286766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]