These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38764372)
1. Risk and protective factors in risk assessment: Predicting inpatient aggression in adult males detained in a forensic mental health setting. Ireland JL; Levtova Y; Abi Semaan CM; Steene LMB; Henrich S; Gaylor L; Driemel L; Volz S; Homann J; Dickopf M; Greenwood L; Chu S Aggress Behav; 2024 May; 50(3):e22150. PubMed ID: 38764372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services. Abidin Z; Davoren M; Naughton L; Gibbons O; Nulty A; Kennedy HG BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Jul; 13():197. PubMed ID: 23890106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential predictive validity of the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management Scales (HCR-20) for inpatient aggression. O'Shea LE; Picchioni MM; Mason FL; Sugarman PA; Dickens GL Psychiatry Res; 2014 Dec; 220(1-2):669-78. PubMed ID: 25150922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strength-based assessment for future violence risk: a retrospective validation study of the Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) Japanese version in forensic psychiatric inpatients. Kashiwagi H; Kikuchi A; Koyama M; Saito D; Hirabayashi N Ann Gen Psychiatry; 2018; 17():5. PubMed ID: 29422940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) outcome in a forensic inpatient population: a prospective cohort study. Jewell A; Dean K; Fahy T; Cullen AE BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Jan; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 28095806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-harm as a risk factor for inpatient aggression among women admitted to forensic psychiatric care. Selenius H; Leppänen Östman S; Strand S Nord J Psychiatry; 2016 Oct; 70(7):554-60. PubMed ID: 27224513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The predictive validity and temporal characteristics of the HCR-20v3 for inpatient violence in forensic inpatient settings. An international study. Picchioni M; Ruiz R; de Girolamo G; Iozzino L; Zamparini M; Wancata J; Unger A; Heitzman J; Markewitz I; Dressing H; Large MM Psychiatry Res; 2024 Sep; 339():116079. PubMed ID: 39024890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing Protective Factors for Violence Risk in U.K. General Mental Health Services Using the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors. Haines A; Brown A; Javaid SF; Khan F; Noblett S; Omodunbi O; Sadiq K; Zaman W; Whittington R Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Sep; 62(12):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 29284378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using dynamic risk and protective factors to predict inpatient aggression: reliability and validity of START assessments. Desmarais SL; Nicholls TL; Wilson CM; Brink J Psychol Assess; 2012 Sep; 24(3):685-700. PubMed ID: 22250595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive validity of dynamic factors: assessing violence risk in forensic psychiatric inpatients. Wilson CM; Desmarais SL; Nicholls TL; Hart SD; Brink J Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):377-88. PubMed ID: 23815092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism. De Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Douglas KS; Nijman HL Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 24933171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF. de Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Koster K; Bogaerts S Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 25210106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of five measures. Hogan NR; Olver ME Law Hum Behav; 2016 Jun; 40(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 26828708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the Risk of Inpatient Violence in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Girardi A; Hancock-Johnson E; Thomas C; Wallang PM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):427-436. PubMed ID: 31554646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive validity of HCR-20, START, and static-99R assessments in predicting institutional aggression among sexual offenders. Cartwright JK; Desmarais SL; Hazel J; Griffith T; Azizian A Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 28857580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for inpatient aggression: the effect of intellectual disability on accuracy. O'Shea LE; Picchioni MM; McCarthy J; Mason FL; Dickens GL J Intellect Disabil Res; 2015 Nov; 59(11):1042-54. PubMed ID: 25683589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validating the Hamilton Anatomy of Risk Management-Forensic Version and the Aggressive Incidents Scale. Cook AN; Moulden HM; Mamak M; Lalani S; Messina K; Chaimowitz G Assessment; 2018 Jun; 25(4):432-445. PubMed ID: 27422806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of the HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme in a Belgian forensic population]. Claix A; Pham TH Encephale; 2004; 30(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 15627049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Predicting aggression during the treatment of forensic psychiatric patients by means of the HCR-20]. Mudde N; Nijman H; van der Hulst W; van den Bout J Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2011; 53(10):705-13. PubMed ID: 21989749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]