139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38764566)
21. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.
Annesi T; Steinway C; Oluwole T; Shilly S; Szalda D; Myers R; Chen J; Jan S
JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2023 Dec; 6():e48924. PubMed ID: 38100579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality and Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Information on Common Prosthodontic Treatments.
Alshehri A; Alghofaili N; ALshunaiber R; Alkadi L
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):62–67. PubMed ID: 33651024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Knowledge About Cleft Lip and/or Palate: An Infodemiology Study.
Alassaf MS; Hasubah SM; Sharbib SH; Alhammad R; Othman AA; Alsulaimani MA; Qazali AA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2023 Dec; ():10556656231223861. PubMed ID: 38158230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Anaesthesia for total hip and knee replacement: A review of patient education materials available online.
Marshall R; Pomeroy E; McKendry C; Gilmartin M; McQuail P; Johnson M
F1000Res; 2019; 8():416. PubMed ID: 33335711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Analysis of Readability, Quality, and Content of Online Information Available for "Stem Cell" Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis.
Ng MK; Mont MA; Piuzzi NS
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Mar; 35(3):647-651.e2. PubMed ID: 31678019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interactivity, Quality, and Content of Websites Promoting Health Behaviors During Infancy: 6-Year Update of the Systematic Assessment.
Jawad D; Cheng H; Wen LM; Rissel C; Baur L; Mihrshahi S; Taki S
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e38641. PubMed ID: 36206031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Readability of Online Information for Parents Concerning Paediatric In-Toeing: An Analysis of the Most Popular Online Public Sources.
Shet SS; Murphy B; Boran S; Taylor C
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e57268. PubMed ID: 38686229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Online quality and readability assessment of Early childhood caries information available on websites from distinct countries: A cross-sectional study.
Ayala Aguirre PE; Aníbal I; Strieder AP; Lotto M; Lopes Rizzato V; Pereira Cruvinel AF; Rios D; Cruvinel T
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2022 Mar; 23(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 35274537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Available patient-centered Internet information on peri-implantitis. Can our patients understand it?
Leira Y; Castelo-Baz P; Pérez-Sayáns M; Blanco J; Lorenzo-Pouso AI
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1569-1574. PubMed ID: 30132142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
