These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38764764)
1. Construction of a nomogram model to predict technical difficulty in performing laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection for rectal cancer. Zhou XC; Guan SW; Ke FY; Dhamija G; Wang Q; Chen BF World J Gastroenterol; 2024 May; 30(18):2418-2439. PubMed ID: 38764764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Analysis on prognosis and influencing factors of postoperative low anterior resection syndrome for rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic anus-preserving radical resection]. Zuo LG; Ge ST; Wang X; Zhu YK; Liu ZH; Yang YT; Jiang CQ; Li SQ; Liu ML Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 22(6):573-578. PubMed ID: 31238637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sacrococcygeal dimensions and curvature are associated with resection quality in rectal cancer excision. Simpson G; Marks T; Blacker S; Smith D; Walsh C Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 32594270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A nomogram predicting the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Ye C; Wang X; Sun Y; Deng Y; Huang Y; Chi P Surg Today; 2021 Nov; 51(11):1835-1842. PubMed ID: 34296313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Akiyoshi T; Kuroyanagi H; Oya M; Konishi T; Fukuda M; Fujimoto Y; Ueno M; Miyata S; Yamaguchi T Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19715805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Risk factor analysis on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy and establishment of a nomogram prediction model]. Jiang W; Feng MY; Dong XY; Dong SM; Zheng JX; Liu XM; Liu WJ; Yan J Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):748-754. PubMed ID: 31422613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication. Ogiso S; Yamaguchi T; Hata H; Fukuda M; Ikai I; Yamato T; Sakai Y Surg Endosc; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1907-12. PubMed ID: 21136101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection. Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Targarona EM; Balague C; Pernas JC; Martinez C; Berindoague R; Gich I; Trias M Ann Surg; 2008 Apr; 247(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 18362627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision]. Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection]. Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Predictive value of MRI pelvic measurements for "difficult pelvis" during total mesorectal excision]. Sun Z; Hou WY; Liu JJ; Xue HD; Xu PR; Wu B; Lin GL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 36562232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A preoperatively predictive difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: experience from a large-scale single center. Li P; Huang CM; Lin JX; Zheng CH; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lu J; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Chen RF Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):4092-101. PubMed ID: 26701705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study. Rubinkiewicz M; Zarzycki P; Czerwińska A; Wysocki M; Gajewska N; Torbicz G; Budzyński A; Pędziwiatr M World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 16(1):218. PubMed ID: 30404633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer. Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors Predicting Difficulty of Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision and Double Stapling Technique. Chen W; Li Q; Fan Y; Li D; Jiang L; Qiu P; Tang L PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151773. PubMed ID: 26992004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT pelvimetry and clinicopathological parameters in evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing open rectal surgery for mid-low rectal cancer. Zhou XC; Su M; Hu KQ; Su YF; Ye YH; Huang CQ; Yu ZL; Li XY; Zhou H; Ni YZ; Jiang YI; Lou Z Oncol Lett; 2016 Jan; 11(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 26870163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]