These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38767340)

  • 1. Replacing Mercury Sphygmomanometers With Mercury-Free Sphygmomanometers for the National Health Survey in Children: Direct Comparisons Applying Two Types of Mercury-Free Sphygmomanometer.
    Kim SH; Kim YM; Kim SH; Shin J; Lee EM
    Korean Circ J; 2024 May; 54(5):270-287. PubMed ID: 38767340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct comparison of an automated oscillometric device with an electronic auscultatory device for epidemiologic survey to evaluate the prevalence of hypertension.
    Kim YM; Ohn DW; Kim SH; Kim DH; Park SM; Cho IJ; Ihm SH; Sung KC; Oh KW; Shin J; Lee EM
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Dec; 101(50):e32299. PubMed ID: 36550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of an automated oscillometric device with a hybrid manual auscultatory device for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Kim YM; Park SH; Shin J; Sung KC; Ihm SH; Kim SH; Kim DH; Park SM; Cho IJ; Oh KW; Lee EM
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2024 May; 26(5):532-542. PubMed ID: 38552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey.
    Choi S; Kim YM; Shin J; Lim YH; Choi SY; Choi BY; Oh KW; Lee HM; Woo KJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e10851. PubMed ID: 29923975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
    Yu DM; Fu P; Yu WT; Guo HJ; Yang XG; Zhao WH; Zhao LY
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
    Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
    J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
    Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation study of the Dinamap ProCare 200 upper arm blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents.
    Lee CG; Park HM; Shin HJ; Moon JS; Hong YM; Kim NS; Ha IS; Chang MJ; Oh KW
    Korean J Pediatr; 2011 Nov; 54(11):463-9. PubMed ID: 22253643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between an automated device and a manual mercury sphygmomanometer in an epidemiological survey of hypertension prevalence.
    Lim YH; Choi SY; Oh KW; Kim Y; Cho ES; Choi BY; Kim YM; Shin J
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Apr; 27(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 23764377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park SH; Park YS
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of the Withings BPM Connect Device for Self-Blood Pressure Measurements in General Population - Validation According to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard.
    Topouchian J; Zelveian P; Hakobyan Z; Gharibyan H; Asmar R
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2022; 18():191-200. PubMed ID: 35386428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.