137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38768185)
1. Subjective perception of visual field defects using random noise-moving images in patients with glaucoma: A comparison of computer graphics and analog noises.
Inoue A; Koike E; Maeda N; Matsumoto C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303849. PubMed ID: 38768185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glaucoma diagnostics.
Geimer SA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
Bengtsson B
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [White-noise field campimetry before and after artificial increase of intraocular pressure. Possible applications in diagnosis and evaluation of glaucoma].
Schiefer U; Ulrich WD; Ulrich C; Wilhelm H; Aulhorn E
Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):477-88. PubMed ID: 1486264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry.
Roberti G; Manni G; Riva I; Holló G; Quaranta L; Agnifili L; Figus M; Giammaria S; Rastelli D; Oddone F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186793. PubMed ID: 29077730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.
Kogure S; Toda Y; Crabb D; Kashiwagi K; Fitzke FW; Tsukahara S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 87(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 12714404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying "preperimetric" glaucoma in standard automated perimetry visual fields.
Asaoka R; Iwase A; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Araie M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 55(12):7814-20. PubMed ID: 25342615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss.
Crabb DP; Smith ND; Glen FC; Burton R; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23415421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting Humphrey 10-2 visual field from 24-2 visual field in eyes with advanced glaucoma.
Sugisaki K; Asaoka R; Inoue T; Yoshikawa K; Kanamori A; Yamazaki Y; Ishikawa S; Nemoto H; Iwase A; Araie M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 104(5):642-647. PubMed ID: 31481390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2C Test Grids for Identifying Central Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Suspect Patients.
Phu J; Kalloniatis M
Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1405-1416. PubMed ID: 33722636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.
Ianchulev T; Pham P; Makarov V; Francis B; Minckler D
Curr Eye Res; 2005 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15875358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Preperimetric Glaucoma Patients Within 3 Years of Diagnosis.
Inuzuka H; Kawase K; Sawada A; Kokuzawa S; Ishida K; Yamamoto T
J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):e591-5. PubMed ID: 25943739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in glaucoma patients].
Kono Y; Maeda M; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 May; 97(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 8337971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Subjective detection of visual field defects using the noise-field on a home TV set in low-tension glaucoma].
Adachi M; Shirato S
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Apr; 96(4):492-5. PubMed ID: 1621589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Kang J; De Arrigunaga S; Freeman SE; Zhao Y; Lin M; Liebman DL; Roldan AM; Kim JA; Chang DS; Friedman DS; Elze T
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set.
Shirato S; Adachi M; Hara T
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1991; 35(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 1770667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can Probability Maps of Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Predict Visual Field Changes in Preperimetric Glaucoma?
Lee WJ; Kim YK; Jeoung JW; Park KH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Dec; 58(14):6257-6264. PubMed ID: 29242899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
