BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38768195)

  • 1. Interpretable metric learning in comparative metagenomics: The adaptive Haar-like distance.
    Gorman ED; Lladser ME
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 May; 20(5):e1011543. PubMed ID: 38768195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Massive metagenomic data analysis using abundance-based machine learning.
    Harris ZN; Dhungel E; Mosior M; Ahn TH
    Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):12. PubMed ID: 31370905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phy-PMRFI: Phylogeny-Aware Prediction of Metagenomic Functions Using Random Forest Feature Importance.
    Wassan JT; Wang H; Browne F; Zheng H
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2019 Jul; 18(3):273-282. PubMed ID: 31021803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing a New Phylogeny-Driven Random Forest Model for Functional Metagenomics.
    Wassan JT; Wang H; Zheng H
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2023 Oct; 22(4):763-770. PubMed ID: 37279136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogeny-based classification of microbial communities.
    Tanaseichuk O; Borneman J; Jiang T
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 24369151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of machine learning techniques for creating urban microbial fingerprints.
    Ryan FJ
    Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):13. PubMed ID: 31420049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrated metagenomic data analysis demonstrates that a loss of diversity in oral microbiota is associated with periodontitis.
    Ai D; Huang R; Wen J; Li C; Zhu J; Xia LC
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(Suppl 1):1041. PubMed ID: 28198672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explaining diversity in metagenomic datasets by phylogenetic-based feature weighting.
    Albanese D; De Filippo C; Cavalieri D; Donati C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1004186. PubMed ID: 25815895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Community-analyzer: a platform for visualizing and comparing microbial community structure across microbiomes.
    Kuntal BK; Ghosh TS; Mande SS
    Genomics; 2013 Oct; 102(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 23978768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MIPE: A metagenome-based community structure explorer and SSU primer evaluation tool.
    Zou B; Li J; Zhou Q; Quan ZX
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174609. PubMed ID: 28350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical considerations for sampling and data analysis in contemporary metagenomics-based environmental studies.
    Staley C; Sadowsky MJ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():14-18. PubMed ID: 30287354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A machine learning framework to determine geolocations from metagenomic profiling.
    Huang L; Xu C; Yang W; Yu R
    Biol Direct; 2020 Nov; 15(1):27. PubMed ID: 33225966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-purposing software for functional characterization of the microbiome.
    Gardiner LJ; Haiminen N; Utro F; Parida L; Seabolt E; Krishna R; Kaufman JH
    Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 33422152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subtractive assembly for comparative metagenomics, and its application to type 2 diabetes metagenomes.
    Wang M; Doak TG; Ye Y
    Genome Biol; 2015 Nov; 16():243. PubMed ID: 26527161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PlasFlow: predicting plasmid sequences in metagenomic data using genome signatures.
    Krawczyk PS; Lipinski L; Dziembowski A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Apr; 46(6):e35. PubMed ID: 29346586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finding phylogeny-aware and biologically meaningful averages of metagenomic samples: L2UniFrac.
    Wei W; Millward A; Koslicki D
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jun; 39(39 Suppl 1):i57-i65. PubMed ID: 37387190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating metagenomics tools for genome binning with real metagenomic datasets and CAMI datasets.
    Yue Y; Huang H; Qi Z; Dou HM; Liu XY; Han TF; Chen Y; Song XJ; Zhang YH; Tu J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):334. PubMed ID: 32723290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metagenomics methods for the study of plant-associated microbial communities: A review.
    Fadiji AE; Babalola OO
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105860. PubMed ID: 32027927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phylogeny-Aware Analysis of Metagenome Community Ecology Based on Matched Reference Genomes while Bypassing Taxonomy.
    Zhu Q; Huang S; Gonzalez A; McGrath I; McDonald D; Haiminen N; Armstrong G; Vázquez-Baeza Y; Yu J; Kuczynski J; Sepich-Poore GD; Swafford AD; Das P; Shaffer JP; Lejzerowicz F; Belda-Ferre P; Havulinna AS; Méric G; Niiranen T; Lahti L; Salomaa V; Kim HC; Jain M; Inouye M; Gilbert JA; Knight R
    mSystems; 2022 Apr; 7(2):e0016722. PubMed ID: 35369727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GNPI: Graph normalization to integrate phylogenetic information for metagenomic host phenotype prediction.
    Li B; Zhong D; Qiao J; Jiang X
    Methods; 2022 Sep; 205():11-17. PubMed ID: 35636652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.