These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38768452)

  • 1. Sensitivity and Specificity of Using GPT-3.5 Turbo Models for Title and Abstract Screening in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
    Tran VT; Gartlehner G; Yaacoub S; Boutron I; Schwingshackl L; Stadelmaier J; Sommer I; Alebouyeh F; Afach S; Meerpohl J; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2024 Jun; 177(6):791-799. PubMed ID: 38768452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers.
    Rathbone J; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():80. PubMed ID: 26073974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of a Large Language Model in Screening Citations.
    Oami T; Okada Y; Nakada TA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jul; 7(7):e2420496. PubMed ID: 38976267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unsupervised title and abstract screening for systematic review: a retrospective case-study using topic modelling methodology.
    Natukunda A; Muchene LK
    Syst Rev; 2023 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 36597132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews.
    Qin X; Liu J; Wang Y; Liu Y; Deng K; Ma Y; Zou K; Li L; Sun X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():121-129. PubMed ID: 33485929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial.
    Gartlehner G; Affengruber L; Titscher V; Noel-Storr A; Dooley G; Ballarini N; König F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():20-28. PubMed ID: 31972274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of text mining to reduce screening workload for injury-focused systematic reviews.
    Giummarra MJ; Lau G; Gabbe BJ
    Inj Prev; 2020 Feb; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 31451565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study.
    Guo E; Gupta M; Deng J; Park YJ; Paget M; Naugler C
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jan; 26():e48996. PubMed ID: 38214966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation and evaluation of an additional GPT-4-based reviewer in PRISMA-based medical systematic literature reviews.
    Landschaft A; Antweiler D; Mackay S; Kugler S; Rüping S; Wrobel S; Höres T; Allende-Cid H
    Int J Med Inform; 2024 Jun; 189():105531. PubMed ID: 38943806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aligning text mining and machine learning algorithms with best practices for study selection in systematic literature reviews.
    Popoff E; Besada M; Jansen JP; Cope S; Kanters S
    Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 9(1):293. PubMed ID: 33308292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT-4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer-reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages.
    Khraisha Q; Put S; Kappenberg J; Warraitch A; Hadfield K
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jul; 15(4):616-626. PubMed ID: 38484744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Title and Abstract Screening and Evaluation in Systematic Reviews (TASER): a pilot randomised controlled trial of title and abstract screening by medical students.
    Ng L; Pitt V; Huckvale K; Clavisi O; Turner T; Gruen R; Elliott JH
    Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 3():121. PubMed ID: 25335439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews.
    Wang Z; Nayfeh T; Tetzlaff J; O'Blenis P; Murad MH
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227742. PubMed ID: 31935267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study.
    Gartlehner G; Wagner G; Lux L; Affengruber L; Dobrescu A; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Viswanathan M
    Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):277. PubMed ID: 31727159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
    Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical utility of serologic testing for celiac disease in ontario: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(21):1-111. PubMed ID: 23074399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crowdsourcing the Citation Screening Process for Systematic Reviews: Validation Study.
    Nama N; Sampson M; Barrowman N; Sandarage R; Menon K; Macartney G; Murto K; Vaccani JP; Katz S; Zemek R; Nasr A; McNally JD
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Apr; 21(4):e12953. PubMed ID: 31033444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.