These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38768846)

  • 1. Assessment of Coronary Stenoses for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    d'Entremont MA; Tiong D; Sadeghirad B; McGrath BP; Cioffi GM; Garni TA; Cheema ZM; Layland J; Revaiah PC; Serruys PW; Stone GW; Jolly SS
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 223():29-39. PubMed ID: 38768846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison among various physiology and angiography-guided strategies for deferring percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.
    Kiyohara Y; Kishino Y; Ueyama HA; Takahashi T; Kobayashi Y; Takagi H; Wiley J; Kuno T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Apr; 61():35-41. PubMed ID: 37891055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Network meta-analysis comparing iFR versus FFR versus coronary angiography to drive coronary revascularization.
    Verardi R; Fioravanti F; Barbero U; Conrotto F; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Moretti C; D'Amico M; Rinaldi M; Escaned J; D'Ascenzo F
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):725-730. PubMed ID: 30136420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio as Predictors of the Placebo-Controlled Response to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.
    Al-Lamee R; Howard JP; Shun-Shin MJ; Thompson D; Dehbi HM; Sen S; Nijjer S; Petraco R; Davies J; Keeble T; Tang K; Malik IS; Cook C; Ahmad Y; Sharp ASP; Gerber R; Baker C; Kaprielian R; Talwar S; Assomull R; Cole G; Keenan NG; Kanaganayagam G; Sehmi J; Wensel R; Harrell FE; Mayet J; Thom SA; Davies JE; Francis DP
    Circulation; 2018 Oct; 138(17):1780-1792. PubMed ID: 29789302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Andersen BK; Ding D; Mogensen LJH; Tu S; Holm NR; Westra J; Wijns W
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2023 Feb; 9(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 36026514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI.
    Götberg M; Christiansen EH; Gudmundsdottir IJ; Sandhall L; Danielewicz M; Jakobsen L; Olsson SE; Öhagen P; Olsson H; Omerovic E; Calais F; Lindroos P; Maeng M; Tödt T; Venetsanos D; James SK; Kåregren A; Nilsson M; Carlsson J; Hauer D; Jensen J; Karlsson AC; Panayi G; Erlinge D; Fröbert O;
    N Engl J Med; 2017 May; 376(19):1813-1823. PubMed ID: 28317438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes.
    Escaned J; Ryan N; Mejía-Rentería H; Cook CM; Dehbi HM; Alegria-Barrero E; Alghamdi A; Al-Lamee R; Altman J; Ambrosia A; Baptista SB; Bertilsson M; Bhindi R; Birgander M; Bojara W; Brugaletta S; Buller C; Calais F; Silva PC; Carlsson J; Christiansen EH; Danielewicz M; Di Mario C; Doh JH; Erglis A; Erlinge D; Gerber RT; Going O; Gudmundsdottir I; Härle T; Hauer D; Hellig F; Indolfi C; Jakobsen L; Janssens L; Jensen J; Jeremias A; Kåregren A; Karlsson AC; Kharbanda RK; Khashaba A; Kikuta Y; Krackhardt F; Koo BK; Koul S; Laine M; Lehman SJ; Lindroos P; Malik IS; Maeng M; Matsuo H; Meuwissen M; Nam CW; Niccoli G; Nijjer SS; Olsson H; Olsson SE; Omerovic E; Panayi G; Petraco R; Piek JJ; Ribichini F; Samady H; Samuels B; Sandhall L; Sapontis J; Sen S; Seto AH; Sezer M; Sharp ASP; Shin ES; Singh J; Takashima H; Talwar S; Tanaka N; Tang K; Van Belle E; van Royen N; Varenhorst C; Vinhas H; Vrints CJ; Walters D; Yokoi H; Fröbert O; Patel MR; Serruys P; Davies JE; Götberg M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 11(15):1437-1449. PubMed ID: 30093050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Outcomes According to Fractional Flow Reserve or Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Deferred Lesions.
    Lee JM; Shin ES; Nam CW; Doh JH; Hwang D; Park J; Kim KJ; Zhang J; Ahn C; Koo BK
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(24):2502-2510. PubMed ID: 29198458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reclassification of Treatment Strategy With Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve: A Substudy From the iFR-SWEDEHEART Trial.
    Andell P; Berntorp K; Christiansen EH; Gudmundsdottir IJ; Sandhall L; Venetsanos D; Erlinge D; Fröbert O; Koul S; Reitan C; Götberg M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2084-2094. PubMed ID: 30336812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography alone in guiding myocardial revascularisation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    Elbadawi A; Sedhom R; Dang AT; Gad MM; Rahman F; Brilakis ES; Elgendy IY; Jneid H
    Heart; 2022 Oct; 108(21):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 35568392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fractional flow reserve versus intravascular imaging to guide decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate lesions: A meta-analysis.
    Liu X; Zhang Y; Xu Y; Tang Z; Wang X; Nie S; Mintz GS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Dec; 102(7):1198-1209. PubMed ID: 37937727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
    Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Major Adverse Cardiac Events Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    ; Lee JM; Choi KH; Koo BK; Dehbi HM; Doh JH; Nam CW; Shin ES; Cook CM; Al-Lamee R; Petraco R; Sen S; Malik IS; Nijjer SS; Mejía-Rentería H; Alegria-Barrero E; Alghamdi A; Altman J; Baptista SB; Bhindi R; Bojara W; Brugaletta S; Silva PC; Di Mario C; Erglis A; Gerber RT; Going O; Härle T; Hellig F; Indolfi C; Janssens L; Jeremias A; Kharbanda RK; Khashaba A; Kikuta Y; Krackhardt F; Laine M; Lehman SJ; Matsuo H; Meuwissen M; Niccoli G; Piek JJ; Ribichini F; Samady H; Sapontis J; Seto AH; Sezer M; Sharp ASP; Singh J; Takashima H; Talwar S; Tanaka N; Tang K; Van Belle E; van Royen N; Vinhas H; Vrints CJ; Walters D; Yokoi H; Samuels B; Buller C; Patel MR; Serruys P; Escaned J; Davies JE
    JAMA Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 4(9):857-864. PubMed ID: 31314045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 5-Year Outcomes of PCI Guided by Measurement of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Götberg M; Berntorp K; Rylance R; Christiansen EH; Yndigegn T; Gudmundsdottir IJ; Koul S; Sandhall L; Danielewicz M; Jakobsen L; Olsson SE; Olsson H; Omerovic E; Calais F; Lindroos P; Maeng M; Venetsanos D; James SK; Kåregren A; Carlsson J; Jensen J; Karlsson AC; Erlinge D; Fröbert O
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 79(10):965-974. PubMed ID: 35272801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Agreement of Quantitative Flow Ratio With Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.
    Hwang D; Choi KH; Lee JM; Mejía-Rentería H; Kim J; Park J; Rhee TM; Jeon KH; Lee HJ; Kim HK; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Shin ES; Nam CW; Kwak JJ; Doh JH; Hahn JY; Choi JH; Choi SH; Escaned J; Koo BK; Gwon HC
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Apr; 8(8):e011605. PubMed ID: 30977410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Discordant Changes in Fractional and Coronary Flow Reserve After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Matsuda J; Murai T; Kanaji Y; Usui E; Araki M; Niida T; Ichijyo S; Hamaya R; Lee T; Yonetsu T; Isobe M; Kakuta T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Nov; 5(12):. PubMed ID: 27899365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Intravascular Imaging, Functional, or Angiographically Guided Coronary Intervention.
    Kuno T; Kiyohara Y; Maehara A; Ueyama HA; Kampaktsis PN; Takagi H; Mehran R; Stone GW; Bhatt DL; Mintz GS; Bangalore S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 82(23):2167-2176. PubMed ID: 37995152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Clinical Significance of Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Ojha CP; Ibrahim A; Paul TK; Mulukutla V; Nagarajarao HS
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2020 Feb; 22(4):17. PubMed ID: 32036467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Instantaneous wave-free ratio as an alternative to fractional flow reserve in assessment of moderate coronary stenoses: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Maini R; Moscona J; Katigbak P; Fernandez C; Sidhu G; Saleh Q; Irimpen A; Samson R; LeJemtel T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018; 19(5 Pt B):613-620. PubMed ID: 29371084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.