These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38769101)

  • 1. Prediction of Cochlear Implant Fitting by Machine Learning Techniques.
    Koyama H; Kashio A; Yamasoba T
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jul; 45(6):643-650. PubMed ID: 38769101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between neural response telemetry measurements and fitting levels.
    Ries M; Kelava I; Ajduk J; Košec A; Žaja R; Trotić R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 182():112001. PubMed ID: 38885546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
    Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of total intravenous vs volatile anesthetics on intraoperatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potential in children undergoing cochlear implant surgery: A randomized prospective study.
    Alhowary AA; El-Radaideh K; Al-Rusan A; Hani DB; Khraise W; Al Omari A; Alzoubi F
    J Clin Anesth; 2017 Feb; 36():80-83. PubMed ID: 28183580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
    Chao X; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H; Fan Z; Xu L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4309. PubMed ID: 36922582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) Measurements in Traditional and Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation.
    Nassiri AM; Yawn RJ; Gifford RH; Haynes DS; Roberts JB; Gilbane MS; Murfee J; Bennett ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(10):918-926. PubMed ID: 31274070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etlert CP; O'Brient S; Oleson JJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 20085195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Two Measurement Paradigms to Determine Electrically Evoked Cochlear Nerve Responses and Their Correlation to Cochlear Nerve Cross-section in Infants and Young Children With Cochlear Implant.
    Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):e206-e213. PubMed ID: 38361306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials for Cochlear Implant Fitting: A Systematic Review.
    de Vos JJ; Biesheuvel JD; Briaire JJ; Boot PS; van Gendt MJ; Dekkers OM; Fiocco M; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):401-411. PubMed ID: 28945656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cochlear implant electrode array design on auditory nerve and behavioral response in children.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 May; 79(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 25746517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3461-3473. PubMed ID: 38219245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) drop within 24 hours after cochlear implantation.
    Chen JK; Chuang AY; Sprinzl GM; Tung TH; Li LP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71929. PubMed ID: 23991008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.
    Walkowiak A; Lorens A; Polak M; Kostek B; Skarzynski H; Szkielkowska A; Skarzynski PH
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.