These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38769142)
1. An MSstats workflow for detecting differentially abundant proteins in large-scale data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry experiments with FragPipe processing. Kohler D; Staniak M; Yu F; Nesvizhskii AI; Vitek O Nat Protoc; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38769142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MSstats Version 4.0: Statistical Analyses of Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Experiments with Chromatography-Based Quantification at Scale. Kohler D; Staniak M; Tsai TH; Huang T; Shulman N; Bernhardt OM; MacLean BX; Nesvizhskii AI; Reiter L; Sabido E; Choi M; Vitek O J Proteome Res; 2023 May; 22(5):1466-1482. PubMed ID: 37018319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Choi M; Chang CY; Clough T; Broudy D; Killeen T; MacLean B; Vitek O Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):2524-6. PubMed ID: 24794931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of DIA proteomics data using MSFragger-DIA and FragPipe computational platform. Yu F; Teo GC; Kong AT; Fröhlich K; Li GX; Demichev V; Nesvizhskii AI Nat Commun; 2023 Jul; 14(1):4154. PubMed ID: 37438352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. nf-encyclopedia: A Cloud-Ready Pipeline for Chromatogram Library Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics Workflows. Allen C; Meinl R; Paez JS; Searle BC; Just S; Pino LK; Fondrie WE J Proteome Res; 2023 Aug; 22(8):2743-2749. PubMed ID: 37417926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Data Processing and Analysis for DIA-Based Phosphoproteomics Using Spectronaut. Martinez-Val A; Bekker-Jensen DB; Hogrebe A; Olsen JV Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2361():95-107. PubMed ID: 34236657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MSstatsShiny: A GUI for Versatile, Scalable, and Reproducible Statistical Analyses of Quantitative Proteomic Experiments. Kohler D; Kaza M; Pasi C; Huang T; Staniak M; Mohandas D; Sabido E; Choi M; Vitek O J Proteome Res; 2023 Feb; 22(2):551-556. PubMed ID: 36622173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Erratum: High-Throughput Identification of Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato in Tomato using Seedling Flood Assay. J Vis Exp; 2023 Oct; (200):. PubMed ID: 37851522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. dia-PASEF data analysis using FragPipe and DIA-NN for deep proteomics of low sample amounts. Demichev V; Szyrwiel L; Yu F; Teo GC; Rosenberger G; Niewienda A; Ludwig D; Decker J; Kaspar-Schoenefeld S; Lilley KS; Mülleder M; Nesvizhskii AI; Ralser M Nat Commun; 2022 Jul; 13(1):3944. PubMed ID: 35803928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection of Features with Consistent Profiles Improves Relative Protein Quantification in Mass Spectrometry Experiments. Tsai TH; Choi M; Banfai B; Liu Y; MacLean BX; Dunkley T; Vitek O Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jun; 19(6):944-959. PubMed ID: 32234965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extensive and Accurate Benchmarking of DIA Acquisition Methods and Software Tools Using a Complex Proteomic Standard. Gotti C; Roux-Dalvai F; Joly-Beauparlant C; Mangnier L; Leclercq M; Droit A J Proteome Res; 2021 Oct; 20(10):4801-4814. PubMed ID: 34472865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MaxQuant and MSstats in Galaxy Enable Reproducible Cloud-Based Analysis of Quantitative Proteomics Experiments for Everyone. Pinter N; Glätzer D; Fahrner M; Fröhlich K; Johnson J; Grüning BA; Warscheid B; Drepper F; Schilling O; Föll MC J Proteome Res; 2022 Jun; 21(6):1558-1565. PubMed ID: 35503992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparative Analysis of Data Analysis Tools for Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry. Zhang F; Ge W; Huang L; Li D; Liu L; Dong Z; Xu L; Ding X; Zhang C; Sun Y; A J; Gao J; Guo T Mol Cell Proteomics; 2023 Sep; 22(9):100623. PubMed ID: 37481071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benchmarking commonly used software suites and analysis workflows for DIA proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Lou R; Cao Y; Li S; Lang X; Li Y; Zhang Y; Shui W Nat Commun; 2023 Jan; 14(1):94. PubMed ID: 36609502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A data-independent acquisition (DIA)-based quantification workflow for proteome analysis of 5000 cells. Jiang N; Gao Y; Xu J; Luo F; Zhang X; Chen R J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2022 Jul; 216():114795. PubMed ID: 35489320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]