These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38769228)

  • 1. Plastic Clamp Versus Conventional Surgical Dissection Technique in Pediatric Circumcision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Yao X; Zhang G; Xiong Q; Feng S; Liu X
    Curr Urol Rep; 2024 Aug; 25(8):173-180. PubMed ID: 38769228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions.
    Hohlfeld A; Ebrahim S; Shaik MZ; Kredo T
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 3(3):CD012250. PubMed ID: 33786810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bipolar scissors circumcision is a safe, fast, and bloodless procedure in children.
    Méndez-Gallart R; Estévez E; Bautista A; Rodríguez P; Taboada P; Armas AL; Pradillos JM; Varela R
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 44(10):2048-53. PubMed ID: 19853772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective randomized trial comparing dissection with Plastibell® circumcision.
    Bastos Netto JM; de Araújo JG; de Almeida Noronha MF; Passos BR; de Bessa J; Figueiredo AA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2010 Dec; 6(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 20153700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A novel disposable circumcision device versus conventional surgery in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis].
    Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Li JH; Tang ZM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Nov; 23(11):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 29738167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis on the outcomes in circumcising children using modified Chinese ShangRing and conventional surgical circumcision.
    Zhang Q; Gao L; Liu D; Song G; Gao P; Zhang S; Zhang J; Xu Y; Han D; Xu Y
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2022 Dec; 39(1):59. PubMed ID: 36550318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study.
    Zhang Z; Yang B; Yu W; Han Y; Xu Z; Chen H; Chen Y; Dai Y
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Apr; 48(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 26797875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Shang Ring circumcision by transverse incision in the distal penis foreskin and pull-up of the interior board for short frenulum praeputii].
    Liu C; Liu XJ; Mu JG; Liu D; Ren YS; Zhang CL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 24873159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional circumcision for redundant prepuce or phimosis: a meta analysis].
    Xiao EL; Ding H; Li YQ; Wang ZP
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Oct; 19(10):935-9. PubMed ID: 24218951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative efficacy and safety of different circumcisions for patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis: A network meta-analysis.
    Huang C; Song P; Xu C; Wang R; Wei L; Zhao X
    Int J Surg; 2017 Jul; 43():17-25. PubMed ID: 28522221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive circumcision with a novel plastic clamp technique: a review of 7,500 cases.
    Senel FM; Demirelli M; Oztek S
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2010 Jul; 26(7):739-45. PubMed ID: 20532526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subcutaneous tissue-sparing dorsal slit with new marking technique: A novel circumcision method.
    Jiang ZL; Sun CW; Sun J; Shi GF; Li H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(16):e15322. PubMed ID: 31008987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of mechanical vs. manual circumcision in the pediatric population: An alternative to the conventional technique?
    Zamora Vidal B; Gómez Cervantes M; Ávila Ramírez LF; Rodríguez de Alarcón García J; Domínguez Amillo E; Guillén Redondo P; Soto Beauregard C
    Cir Pediatr; 2023 Oct; 36(4):165-170. PubMed ID: 37818898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of two methods in circumcision: a new disposable device versus classic sleeve technique.
    Kılıç S
    BMC Urol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38877524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases].
    Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parental evaluation of postoperative outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection by dorsal slit technique: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nagdeve NG; Naik H; Bhingare PD; Morey SM
    J Pediatr Urol; 2013 Oct; 9(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 23122924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wound healing rates and wound problems of conventional circumcision compared with ring circumcision: A meta-analysis.
    Wang D; Li Z; Chen X; Wang H
    Int Wound J; 2023 Nov; 20(9):3699-3707. PubMed ID: 37303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A novel disposable ring versus the suture device in circumcision].
    Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Tang ZM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Dec; 23(12):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 29738180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical effect of circumcision stapler in the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce].
    Huo ZC; Liu G; Wang W; He DG; Yu H; Fan WJ; Zhong Z
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 21(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 26027100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does using a laser improve outcomes of conventional circumcision in adult and children populations? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Scarcella S; Law YXT; Bravi CA; Piazza P; Heldwein FL; Ronchi P; Lacetera V; Beatrici V; Gauhar V; Castellani D
    Andrology; 2023 Jan; 11(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 36251782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.