These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38769251)

  • 1. Correction: Something in Our Ears Is Oscillating, but What? A Modeller's View of Efforts to Model Spontaneous Emissions.
    Wit HP; Bell A
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38769251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Something in Our Ears Is Oscillating, but What? A Modeller's View of Efforts to Model Spontaneous Emissions.
    Wit HP; Bell A
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38710871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Making the world a simpler place: the modeller's temptation to seek alternative trial results.
    Colbourn T; Prost A; Seward N
    BMJ Glob Health; 2018; 3(5):e001194. PubMed ID: 30397517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity analysis methods in the biomedical sciences.
    Qian G; Mahdi A
    Math Biosci; 2020 May; 323():108306. PubMed ID: 31953192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysing longitudinal continuous quality of life data with dropout.
    Curran D; Molenberghs G; Aaronson NK; Fossa SD; Sylvester RJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2002 Feb; 11(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 11923994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pharmacodynamic effects in the cardiovascular system: the modeller's view.
    Fink M; Noble D
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 106(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 20470255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears.
    Probst R; Coats AC; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 3722006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bilateral Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Show Coupling between Active Oscillators in the Two Ears.
    Roongthumskul Y; Ó Maoiléidigh D; Hudspeth AJ
    Biophys J; 2019 May; 116(10):2023-2034. PubMed ID: 31010667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modeller's perspective on infection dynamics within and between hosts.
    Severins M
    Vet Q; 2012; 32(3-4):169-78. PubMed ID: 23121091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Making Use of Averaging Methods in MODELLER for Protein Structure Prediction.
    Rosignoli S; Lustrino E; Di Silverio I; Paiardini A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Jan; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38339009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2061-72. PubMed ID: 18207487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss.
    Probst R; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Coats AC
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1987; 8(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 3592079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency variation in spontaneous sound emissions from guinea pig and human ears.
    Brown AM; Woodward S; Gaskill SA
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1990; 247(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 2310545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of cochlear function in patients with tinnitus using spontaneous and transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Santaolalla Montoya F; Ibargüen AM; del Rey AS; Fernández JM
    J Otolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 17963669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
    Xu J; Liu C; Guo L; Lian N; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: incidence and short-time variability in normal ears.
    Lind O; Randa JS
    J Otolaryngol; 1990 Aug; 19(4):252-9. PubMed ID: 2213998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Including business strategy in model-driven methods: an experiment.
    Noel R; Panach JI; Pastor O
    Requir Eng; 2023 Mar; ():1-30. PubMed ID: 37359152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears: evidence of active hearing?
    Kössl M; Möckel D; Weber M; Seyfarth EA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2008 Jul; 194(7):597-609. PubMed ID: 18516607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distortion product emissions in humans. II. Relations to acoustic immittance and stimulus frequency and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():15-29. PubMed ID: 2110796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.