147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38770323)
1. Assessment of consolidative multi-criteria decision making (C-MCDM) algorithms for optimal mapping of polymer materials in additive manufacturing: A case study of orthotic application.
Mian SH; Abouel Nasr E; Moiduddin K; Saleh M; Abidi MH; Alkhalefah H
Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e30867. PubMed ID: 38770323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A decision analysis model for material selection using simple ranking process.
Zakeri S; Chatterjee P; Konstantas D; Ecer F
Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8631. PubMed ID: 37244904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Additive manufacturing process selection for automotive industry using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC EDAS.
Menekse A; Ertemel AV; Camgoz Akdag H; Gorener A
PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282676. PubMed ID: 36893100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An integrated CRITIC-TOPSIS- and Entropy-TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking approach for evaluating green energy sources and its experimental analysis on pyrolysis.
Lakshmi BM; Mathew M; Kinol AMJ; Vedagiri B; Perumal SB; Madhu P; Dhanalakshmi CS
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(40):61370-61382. PubMed ID: 35445298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach.
Varmazyar M; Dehghanbaghi M; Afkhami M
Eval Program Plann; 2016 Oct; 58():125-140. PubMed ID: 27371786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Streamlining apartment provider evaluation: A spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model.
Nguyen PH; Tran TH; Thi Nguyen LA; Pham HA; Thi Pham MA
Heliyon; 2023 Dec; 9(12):e22353. PubMed ID: 38144291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Digital Technology Strategies in COVID-19 Pandemic Under Uncertainty.
Salimian S; Mousavi SM
Arab J Sci Eng; 2023; 48(5):7005-7017. PubMed ID: 36090763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal evaluation of crop residues for gasification in Ghana using integrated multi-criterial decision making techniques.
Osei I; Addo A; Kemausuor F
Heliyon; 2023 Oct; 9(10):e20553. PubMed ID: 37822638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.
Chen CH
Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A historical review and analysis on MOORA and its fuzzy extensions for different applications.
Singh R; Pathak VK; Kumar R; Dikshit M; Aherwar A; Singh V; Singh T
Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e25453. PubMed ID: 38352792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A modified TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) applied to choosing appropriate selection methods in ongoing surveillance for Avian Influenza in Canada.
El Allaki F; Christensen J; Vallières A
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Apr; 165():36-43. PubMed ID: 30851926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prioritization of water erosion-prone sub-watersheds using three ensemble methods in Qareaghaj catchment, southern Iran.
Pourghasemi HR; Honarmandnejad F; Rezaei M; Tarazkar MH; Sadhasivam N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(28):37894-37917. PubMed ID: 33723776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for Building Materials Supplier Selection.
Chen CH
Entropy (Basel); 2021 Nov; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 34945903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS.
Nabizadeh R; Yousefzadeh S; Yaghmaeian K; Alimohammadi M; Mokhtari Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20437-20448. PubMed ID: 34735703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of TOPSIS method for flood susceptibility mapping using Excel and GIS.
Mitra R; Das J; Kamruzzaman M
MethodsX; 2023 Dec; 11():102263. PubMed ID: 37416489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposal for an objective binary benchmarking framework that validates each other for comparing MCDM methods through data analytics.
Baydaş M; Eren T; Stević Ž; Starčević V; Parlakkaya R
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1350. PubMed ID: 37153010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prioritizing the glucose-lowering medicines for type 2 diabetes by an extended fuzzy decision-making approach with target-based attributes.
Eghbali-Zarch M; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R; Esfahanian F; Masoud S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Aug; 60(8):2423-2444. PubMed ID: 35776373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
