147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38770323)
21. An integrated fuzzy sustainable supplier evaluation and selection framework for green supply chains in reverse logistics.
Tavana M; Shaabani A; Santos-Arteaga FJ; Valaei N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53953-53982. PubMed ID: 34043173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A novel two-phase group decision-making model for circular supplier selection under picture fuzzy environment.
Kaya SK
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(12):34135-34157. PubMed ID: 36508096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
Do QH; Tran VT; Tran TT
Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e30772. PubMed ID: 38933935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment.
Rashidi F; Sharifian S
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Aug; 194(9):657. PubMed ID: 35941257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios.
Chung ES; Kim Y
J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():505-516. PubMed ID: 25218330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Machine learning for detecting COVID-19 from cough sounds: An ensemble-based MCDM method.
Chowdhury NK; Kabir MA; Rahman MM; Islam SMS
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Jun; 145():105405. PubMed ID: 35318171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Polymeric Materials Selection for Flexible Pulsating Heat Pipe Manufacturing Using a Comparative Hybrid MCDM Approach.
Ordu M; Der O
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Jul; 15(13):. PubMed ID: 37447579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On SIR-based MCDM approach: Selecting a charcoal firm using hybrid fuzzy number on a Triple Vague structure.
Rajadurai M; Kaliyaperumal P
Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24248. PubMed ID: 38293499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A novel MCDM approach for design concept evaluation based on interval-valued picture fuzzy sets.
Ma Q; Sun H; Chen Z; Tan Y
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294596. PubMed ID: 38011124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cobot selection using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS based multi-criteria decision making technique for fuel filter assembly process.
C S; Subramaniam SK
Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26374. PubMed ID: 38390129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic TOPSIS Approach for Smart Medical Device Selection.
Abdel-Basset M; Manogaran G; Gamal A; Smarandache F
J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(2):38. PubMed ID: 30627801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multi-Response Optimization of Porous Asphalt Mixtures Reinforced with Aramid and Polyolefin Fibers Employing the CRITIC-TOPSIS Based on Taguchi Methodology.
Slebi-Acevedo CJ; Pascual-Muñoz P; Lastra-González P; Castro-Fresno D
Materials (Basel); 2019 Nov; 12(22):. PubMed ID: 31752227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component.
Kumar R; Dubey R; Singh S; Singh S; Prakash C; Nirsanametla Y; Królczyk G; Chudy R
Materials (Basel); 2021 Apr; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 33924189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Natural gas based on combined fuzzy TOPSIS technique and entropy.
Fahmi A; Khan A; Thabet Abdeljawad ; Alqudah MA
Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23391. PubMed ID: 38192751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identification of dominant risk factor involved in spread of COVID-19 using hesitant fuzzy MCDM methodology.
Ghorui N; Ghosh A; Mondal SP; Bajuri MY; Ahmadian A; Salahshour S; Ferrara M
Results Phys; 2021 Feb; 21():103811. PubMed ID: 33520630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Making Group Decisions within the Framework of a Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linear Regression Model.
Sultan A; Sałabun W; Faizi S; Ismail M; Shekhovtsov A
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35957293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Multicriteria Decision-Making Framework for Access Point Selection in Hybrid LiFi/WiFi Networks Using Integrated AHP-VIKOR Technique.
Badeel R; Subramaniam SK; Muhammed A; Hanapi ZM
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Novel Integration of IF-DEMATEL and TOPSIS for the Classifier Selection Problem in Assistive Technology Adoption for People with Dementia.
Ortíz-Barrios MA; Garcia-Constantino M; Nugent C; Alfaro-Sarmiento I
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods.
Bid S; Siddique G
Heliyon; 2019 Jun; 5(6):e01956. PubMed ID: 31294108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
