These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38771127)

  • 1. An examination of individual differences in levels of processing.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL
    Memory; 2024 May; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38771127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in attention at encoding: Insights from pupillometry and eye gaze fixations.
    Miller AL; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Dec; 46(12):2277-2294. PubMed ID: 31750720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupillary correlates of individual differences in long-term memory.
    Robison MK; Trost JM; Schor D; Gibson BS; Healey MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1355-1366. PubMed ID: 35355225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):90-111. PubMed ID: 32761311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Glimpse of Memory Through the Eyes: Pupillary Responses Measured During Encoding Reflect the Likelihood of Subsequent Memory Recall in an Auditory Free Recall Test.
    Micula A; Rönnberg J; Książek P; Murmu Nielsen R; Wendt D; Fiedler L; Ng EHN
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221130581. PubMed ID: 36305085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tracking working memory maintenance with pupillometry.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):461-484. PubMed ID: 29204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):757-65. PubMed ID: 25324180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pupillary correlates of individual differences in n-back task performance.
    Robison MK; Garner LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):799-807. PubMed ID: 38326632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in working memory capacity and episodic memory: examining the importance of encoding specificity.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 21912997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pupillometry tracks fluctuations in working memory performance.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):407-419. PubMed ID: 30411207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
    Rose NS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.
    Zhang Y; Lehmann A; Deroche M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2277-2295. PubMed ID: 37407798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are items actively removed from working memory during free time in children with developmental language disorder?
    Larson C; Crespo K; Kaushanskaya M; Ellis Weismer S
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Sep; 57(5):1006-1022. PubMed ID: 35611864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How the size of the to-be-learned material influences the encoding and later retrieval of associative memories: A pupillometric assessment.
    Pajkossy P; Racsmány M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226684. PubMed ID: 31891588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Classifying brain states and pupillary responses associated with the processing of old and new information.
    Campos-Arteaga G; Araneda A; Ruiz S; Rodríguez E; Sitaram R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Jun; 176():129-141. PubMed ID: 35405146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing.
    Dionisio DP; Granholm E; Hillix WA; Perrine WF
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar; 38(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 11347866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of spatial and verbal working memory load on semantic relatedness judgements.
    Khanzhyn D; van Heuven WJB; Rataj K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Apr; 31(2):781-789. PubMed ID: 37723334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.