BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38771417)

  • 1. Multiscale modelling of transport in polymer-based reverse-osmosis/nanofiltration membranes: present and future.
    Zhu H; Szymczyk A; Ghoufi A
    Discov Nano; 2024 May; 19(1):91. PubMed ID: 38771417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
    Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
    J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applying Transition-State Theory to Explore Transport and Selectivity in Salt-Rejecting Membranes: A Critical Review.
    Shefer I; Lopez K; Straub AP; Epsztein R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 56(12):7467-7483. PubMed ID: 35549171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling micropollutant removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: considerations and challenges.
    Castaño Osorio S; Biesheuvel PM; Spruijt E; Dykstra JE; van der Wal A
    Water Res; 2022 Oct; 225():119130. PubMed ID: 36240724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pore-Scale Geochemical Reactivity Associated with CO
    Noiriel C; Daval D
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Apr; 50(4):759-768. PubMed ID: 28362082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices.
    Ma Q; Lei Q; Liu F; Song Z; Khusid B; Zhang W
    Water Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 96(2):e10983. PubMed ID: 38291820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rejection Mechanism of Ionic Solute Removal by Nanofiltration Membranes: An Overview.
    Suhalim NS; Kasim N; Mahmoudi E; Shamsudin IJ; Mohammad AW; Mohamed Zuki F; Jamari NL
    Nanomaterials (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35159781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advances in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes: experimental observations and applications.
    Bhanushali D; Bhattacharyya D
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Mar; 984():159-77. PubMed ID: 12783816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal and zero liquid discharge with reverse osmosis using low-salt-rejection membranes.
    Wang Z; Deshmukh A; Du Y; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2020 Mar; 170():115317. PubMed ID: 31786394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integration of Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Technologies in Polyphenols Recovery Schemes from Winery and Olive Mill Wastes by Aqueous-Based Processing.
    Tapia-Quirós P; Montenegro-Landívar MF; Reig M; Vecino X; Saurina J; Granados M; Cortina JL
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35323814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) & reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water.
    Srivastava A; K A; Nair A; Ram S; Agarwal S; Ali J; Singh R; Garg MC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111497. PubMed ID: 33130432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of organic contaminant rejection by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes using interpretable machine learning models.
    Zhu T; Zhang Y; Tao C; Chen W; Cheng H
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 857(Pt 1):159348. PubMed ID: 36228787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanisms and models for water transport in reverse osmosis membranes: history, critical assessment, and recent developments.
    Heiranian M; Fan H; Wang L; Lu X; Elimelech M
    Chem Soc Rev; 2023 Dec; 52(24):8455-8480. PubMed ID: 37889082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unlocking the potential of polymeric desalination membranes by understanding molecular-level interactions and transport mechanisms.
    Nickerson TR; Antonio EN; McNally DP; Toney MF; Ban C; Straub AP
    Chem Sci; 2023 Jan; 14(4):751-770. PubMed ID: 36755730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes for highly efficient PFASs removal: overview, challenges and future perspectives.
    Mastropietro TF; Bruno R; Pardo E; Armentano D
    Dalton Trans; 2021 Apr; 50(16):5398-5410. PubMed ID: 33908956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
    Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
    Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.