These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38772253)

  • 1. What do you learn from a single cue? Dimensional reweighting and cue reassociation from experience with a newly unreliable phonetic cue.
    Kapatsinski V; Bramlett AA; Idemaru K
    Cognition; 2024 Aug; 249():105818. PubMed ID: 38772253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning mechanisms in cue reweighting.
    Harmon Z; Idemaru K; Kapatsinski V
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():76-88. PubMed ID: 30928780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.
    Francis AL; Kaganovich N; Driscoll-Huber C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1234-51. PubMed ID: 18681610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.
    Lehet M; Holt LL
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):885-912. PubMed ID: 27666146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.
    Schertz J; Cho T; Lotto A; Warner N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 26404530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brainstem and early cortical auditory activities associated with language differences in acoustic cue weighting for voicing perception.
    Tamura S; Sung Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Sep; 735():135154. PubMed ID: 32544598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Language Specificity in Phonetic Cue Weighting: Monolingual and Bilingual Perception of the Stop Voicing Contrast in English and Spanish.
    Schertz J; Carbonell K; Lotto AJ
    Phonetica; 2020; 77(3):186-208. PubMed ID: 31018217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensorimotor adaptation and cue reweighting compensate for distorted 3D shape information, accounting for paradoxical perception-action dissociations.
    Cesanek E; Taylor JA; Domini F
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Apr; 123(4):1407-1419. PubMed ID: 32101506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience with speech sounds is not necessary for cue trading by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Flaherty M; Dent ML; Sawusch JR
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177676. PubMed ID: 28562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Specificity of dimension-based statistical learning in word recognition.
    Idemaru K; Holt LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1009-21. PubMed ID: 24364708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Of mice and men: Speech sound acquisition as discriminative learning from prediction error, not just statistical tracking.
    Nixon JS
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104081. PubMed ID: 31901874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.
    Theodore RM; Monto NR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cue-integration and context effects in speech: evidence against speaking-rate normalization.
    Toscano JC; McMurray B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1284-301. PubMed ID: 22532385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Depth cue reweighting requires altered correlations with haptic feedback.
    Cesanek E; Domini F
    J Vis; 2019 Dec; 19(14):3. PubMed ID: 31826248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):349-66. PubMed ID: 11999859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception.
    Kong EJ; Lee H
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 28937301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.
    Clayards M; Tanenhaus MK; Aslin RN; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):804-9. PubMed ID: 18582855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of voice onset time (VOT), stop burst and vowel on the perception of voicing in Hebrew stops: preliminary results.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2003; 14(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 14558730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues.
    Llanos F; Dmitrieva O; Shultz A; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2213-24. PubMed ID: 23967951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An acoustic and perceptual study of initial stops produced by profoundly hearing impaired adolescents.
    Khouw E; Ciocca V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Jan; 21(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 17364614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.