These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38772395)

  • 1. Noise-based correction for electrical impedance tomography.
    Mason K; Maurino-Alperovich F; Holder D; Aristovich K
    Physiol Meas; 2024 Jun; 45(6):. PubMed ID: 38772395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-invasive imaging of neural activity with magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography (MDEIT): a modelling study.
    Mason K; Aristovich K; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2023 Nov; 44(11):. PubMed ID: 37832564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a 3D reconstruction algorithm for EIT of human brain function in a realistic head-shaped tank.
    Tidswell AT; Gibson A; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2001 Feb; 22(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 11236878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of statistical parametric mapping (SPM) to enhance electrical impedance tomography (EIT) image sets.
    Yerworth RJ; Zhang Y; Tidswell T; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S141-51. PubMed ID: 17664632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
    Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual thorax geometry reduces position and size differences in reconstructed images of electrical impedance tomography.
    Zhao Z; Frerichs I; Pulletz S; Müller-Lisse U; Möller K
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(6):797-807. PubMed ID: 25408396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of individualized electrical impedance tomography and image reconstruction settings upon the assessment of regional ventilation distribution: Comparison to 4-dimensional computed tomography in a porcine model.
    Thürk F; Boehme S; Mudrak D; Kampusch S; Wielandner A; Prosch H; Braun C; Toemboel FPR; Hofmanninger J; Kaniusas E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182215. PubMed ID: 28763474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of headnet electrode arrays for electrical impedance tomography of the human head.
    Tidswell AT; Bagshaw AP; Holder DS; Yerworth RJ; Eadie L; Murray S; Morgan L; Bayford RH
    Physiol Meas; 2003 May; 24(2):527-44. PubMed ID: 12812436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvements in the image quality of ventilatory tomograms by electrical impedance tomography.
    Hahn G; Dittmar J; Just A; Hellige G
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S51-61. PubMed ID: 18544812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bi-frequency symmetry difference electrical impedance tomography-a novel technique for perturbation detection in static scenes.
    McDermott B; Avery J; O'Halloran M; Aristovich K; Porter E
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Apr; 40(4):044005. PubMed ID: 30786267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of a Patient-Specific Structural Prior Mask on Electrical Impedance Tomography Image Reconstructions.
    Chen R; Krueger-Ziolek S; Battistel A; Rupitsch SJ; Moeller K
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of frequency difference reconstruction algorithms for the detection of acute stroke using EIT in a realistic head-shaped tank.
    Packham B; Koo H; Romsauerova A; Ahn S; McEwan A; Jun SC; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):767-86. PubMed ID: 22531059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
    Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image Reconstruction Using Supervised Learning in Wearable Electrical Impedance Tomography of the Thorax.
    Ivanenko M; Smolik WT; Wanta D; Midura M; Wróblewski P; Hou X; Yan X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Sep; 23(18):. PubMed ID: 37765831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrical Impedance Tomography: Tissue Properties to Image Measures.
    Adler A; Boyle A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2494-2504. PubMed ID: 28715324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography based on genetic algorithm].
    Hou W; Mo Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 20(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 12744177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EIT image reconstruction with four dimensional regularization.
    Dai T; Soleimani M; Adler A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2008 Sep; 46(9):889-99. PubMed ID: 18633661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uniform background assumption produces misleading lung EIT images.
    Grychtol B; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2013 Jun; 34(6):579-93. PubMed ID: 23718942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct EIT reconstructions of complex admittivities on a chest-shaped domain in 2-D.
    Hamilton SJ; Mueller JL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Apr; 32(4):757-69. PubMed ID: 23314771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.