These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38773502)

  • 21. Loading capacity of zirconia implant supported hybrid ceramic crowns.
    Rohr N; Coldea A; Zitzmann NU; Fischer J
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):e279-88. PubMed ID: 26458762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
    Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of the supporting die structures on the fracture strength of all-ceramic materials.
    Yucel MT; Yondem I; Aykent F; Eraslan O
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1105-10. PubMed ID: 21845404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fracture resistance of zirconia FPDs with adhesive bonding versus conventional cementation.
    Rosentritt M; Hmaidouch R; Behr M; Handel G; Schneider-Feyrer S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 21479286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fracture load of zirconia crowns based on preparation and cement type.
    Jenista JS; Hoopes WL; Knowles JF; Vandewalle KS
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(5):22-27. PubMed ID: 35993929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro shear bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia.
    Qeblawi DM; Campillo-Funollet M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 25438742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
    Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retention strength of monolithic zirconia crowns cemented with different primer-cement systems.
    Shokry M; Al-Zordk W; Ghazy M
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 May; 22(1):187. PubMed ID: 35590310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture Strength, Failure Types, and Weibull Characteristics of Three-Unit Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses After Cyclic Loading: Effects of Veneering and Air-Abrasion Protocols.
    Campos F; Souza RO; Bottino MA; Özcan M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2016; 36(6):901-908. PubMed ID: 27740655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
    López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
    Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
    Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Zirconia Cantilever Fixed Dental Prostheses Supported by One or Two Implants: An In Vitro Study on Mechanical Stability and Technical Outcomes.
    Karasan D; Canay S; Sailer I; Att W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):748-755. PubMed ID: 35904831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns.
    Sun T; Zhou S; Lai R; Liu R; Ma S; Zhou Z; Longquan S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():93-101. PubMed ID: 24762856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fracture load of implant-supported zirconia all-ceramic crowns luted with various cements.
    Lim HP; Yoo JM; Park SW; Yang HS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 20617227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro evaluation of the shear bond strength and bioactivity of a bioceramic cement for bonding monolithic zirconia.
    Dandoulaki C; Rigos AE; Kontonasaki E; Karagiannis V; Kokoti M; Theodorou GS; Papadopoulou L; Koidis P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):167.e1-167.e10. PubMed ID: 31326146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of luting space of zirconia abutment on marginal discrepancy and tensile strength after dynamic loading.
    Pacheco ND; Senna PM; Gomes RS; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):683.e1-683.e8. PubMed ID: 33583618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.