108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38775671)
1. Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: Application to a Large Representative UK Screening Cohort.
Ellis S; Gomes S; Trumble M; Halling-Brown MD; Young KC; Chaudhry NS; Harris P; Warren LM
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; ():e230431. PubMed ID: 38775671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of an AI Model to Assess Future Breast Cancer Risk.
Damiani C; Kalliatakis G; Sreenivas M; Al-Attar M; Rose J; Pudney C; Lane EF; Cuzick J; Montana G; Brentnall AR
Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e222679. PubMed ID: 37310244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial Intelligence-Powered Imaging Biomarker Based on Mammography for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Park EK; Lee H; Kim M; Kim T; Kim J; Kim KH; Kooi T; Chang Y; Ryu S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jun; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 38928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing Breast Cancer Risk by Combining AI for Lesion Detection and Mammographic Texture.
Lauritzen AD; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230227. PubMed ID: 37642571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Presurgical Upgrade Prediction of DCIS to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Using Time-dependent Deep Learning Models with DCE MRI.
Mayfield JD; Ataya D; Abdalah M; Stringfield O; Bui MM; Raghunand N; Niell B; El Naqa I
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Jun; ():e230348. PubMed ID: 38900042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are better AI algorithms for breast cancer detection also better at predicting risk? A paired case-control study.
Santeramo R; Damiani C; Wei J; Montana G; Brentnall AR
Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Feb; 26(1):25. PubMed ID: 38326868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.
Kim HE; Kim HH; Han BK; Kim KH; Han K; Nam H; Lee EH; Kim EK
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Mar; 2(3):e138-e148. PubMed ID: 33334578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Yala A; Lehman C; Schuster T; Portnoi T; Barzilay R
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 31063083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of an AI Score Combining Cancer Signs, Masking, and Risk to Select Patients for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening.
Liu Y; Sorkhei M; Dembrower K; Azizpour H; Strand F; Smith K
Radiology; 2024 Apr; 311(1):e232535. PubMed ID: 38591971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):41. PubMed ID: 31228956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep learning performance for detection and classification of microcalcifications on mammography.
Pesapane F; Trentin C; Ferrari F; Signorelli G; Tantrige P; Montesano M; Cicala C; Virgoli R; D'Acquisto S; Nicosia L; Origgi D; Cassano E
Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Nov; 7(1):69. PubMed ID: 37934382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.
Kwon MR; Chang Y; Ham SY; Cho Y; Kim EY; Kang J; Park EK; Kim KH; Kim M; Kim TS; Lee H; Kwon R; Lim GY; Choi HR; Choi J; Kook SH; Ryu S
Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Apr; 26(1):68. PubMed ID: 38649889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep Learning Segmentation of Ascites on Abdominal CT Scans for Automatic Volume Quantification.
Hou B; Lee SW; Lee JM; Koh C; Xiao J; Pickhardt PJ; Summers RM
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Jun; ():e230601. PubMed ID: 38900043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual Biopsy by Using Artificial Intelligence-based Multimodal Modeling of Binational Mammography Data.
Barros V; Tlusty T; Barkan E; Hexter E; Gruen D; Guindy M; Rosen-Zvi M
Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e220027. PubMed ID: 36283109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. European validation of an image-derived AI-based short-term risk model for individualized breast cancer screening-a nested case-control study.
Eriksson M; Román M; Gräwingholt A; Castells X; Nitrosi A; Pattacini P; Heywang-Köbrunner S; Rossi PG
Lancet Reg Health Eur; 2024 Feb; 37():100798. PubMed ID: 38362558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Saliency of breast lesions in breast cancer detection using artificial intelligence.
Pertuz S; Ortega D; Suarez É; Cancino W; Africano G; Rinta-Kiikka I; Arponen O; Paris S; Lozano A
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20545. PubMed ID: 37996504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
