These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38777540)
1. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus MR Imaging of the Breast. Mann RM; Longo V Radiol Clin North Am; 2024 Jul; 62(4):643-659. PubMed ID: 38777540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging. Lewin J Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2018 May; 26(2):259-263. PubMed ID: 29622130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size. Tekinhatun M; Sabir N; Erdem E; Yilmaz S; Ufuk F Turk J Med Sci; 2024; 54(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 38812642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Açar ÇR; Orguc S Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Aug; 24(6):481-493. PubMed ID: 38777678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: Contrast-enhanced mammography versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Shahraki Z; Ghaffari M; Nakhaie Moghadam M; Parooie F; Salarzaei M Breast Dis; 2022; 41(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 35754256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angiomammography: A review of current evidences. Dromain C; Vietti-Violi N; Meuwly JY Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):593-605. PubMed ID: 30962168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the applicability of BI-RADS® MRI for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Travieso-Aja MM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Luzardo OP Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019; 61(6):477-488. PubMed ID: 31262509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study. Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current Status of Contrast Enhanced Mammography: A Comprehensive Review. Kornecki A Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Feb; 73(1):141-156. PubMed ID: 34492211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening. Covington MF Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Breast Imaging. Lancaster RB; Gulla S; De Los Santos J; Umphrey HR Semin Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 53(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 30449347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast enhanced spectral mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging. Luczynska E; Pawlak M; Piegza T; Popiela TJ; Heinze S; Dyczek S; Rudnicki W Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(2):92-97. PubMed ID: 33448005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast masses with rim enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: morphological and enhancement features for diagnosis and differentiation of benign and malignant. Wen C; Wang S; Ma M; Xu Z; Zeng F; Zeng H; Liao X; He Z; Xu W; Chen W Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1157):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 38521539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions. Li L; Roth R; Germaine P; Ren S; Lee M; Hunter K; Tinney E; Liao L Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Feb; 98(2):113-123. PubMed ID: 27687829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]