These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A counterfactual simulation model of causation by omission. Gerstenberg T; Stephan S Cognition; 2021 Nov; 216():104842. PubMed ID: 34303272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments for physical events. Gerstenberg T; Goodman ND; Lagnado DA; Tenenbaum JB Psychol Rev; 2021 Oct; 128(5):936-975. PubMed ID: 34096754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mental jenga: A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments about physical support. Zhou L; Smith KA; Tenenbaum JB; Gerstenberg T J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Aug; 152(8):2237-2269. PubMed ID: 37093666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What would have happened? Counterfactuals, hypotheticals and causal judgements. Gerstenberg T Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 377(1866):20210339. PubMed ID: 36314143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Causal responsibility and counterfactuals. Lagnado DA; Gerstenberg T; Zultan R Cogn Sci; 2013 Aug; 37(6):1036-73. PubMed ID: 23855451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Counterfactual Plausibility and Comparative Similarity. Stanley ML; Stewart GW; Brigard F Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 5():1216-1228. PubMed ID: 28500675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A counterfactual explanation for the action effect in causal judgment. Henne P; Niemi L; Pinillos Á; De Brigard F; Knobe J Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():157-164. PubMed ID: 31082750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling confidence in causal judgments. O'Neill K; Henne P; Pearson J; De Brigard F J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Aug; 153(8):2142-2159. PubMed ID: 39101911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Theory of mind and moral cognition: exploring the connections. Knobe J Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Aug; 9(8):357-9. PubMed ID: 16006176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments? Bialek M; Terbeck S Cogn Process; 2016 Aug; 17(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 27016146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immoral Professors and Malfunctioning Tools: Counterfactual Relevance Accounts Explain the Effect of Norm Violations on Causal Selection. Kominsky JF; Phillips J Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12792. PubMed ID: 31742757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Epstude K; Roese NJ Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2008 May; 12(2):168-92. PubMed ID: 18453477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Counterfactual thinking and recency effects in causal judgment. Henne P; Kulesza A; Perez K; Houcek A Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104708. PubMed ID: 33819848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Moral dynamics: Grounding moral judgment in intuitive physics and intuitive psychology. Sosa FA; Ullman T; Tenenbaum JB; Gershman SJ; Gerstenberg T Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104890. PubMed ID: 34487974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lucky or clever? From expectations to responsibility judgments. Gerstenberg T; Ullman TD; Nagel J; Kleiman-Weiner M; Lagnado DA; Tenenbaum JB Cognition; 2018 Aug; 177():122-141. PubMed ID: 29677593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]