These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38777678)

  • 1. Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Açar ÇR; Orguc S
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Aug; 24(6):481-493. PubMed ID: 38777678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size.
    Tekinhatun M; Sabir N; Erdem E; Yilmaz S; Ufuk F
    Turk J Med Sci; 2024; 54(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 38812642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of MRI-Directed Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Biopsy Planning for Suspicious MRI-Detected Breast Lesions.
    Nida BA; Rooney TB; Miller MM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 36000664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of contrast-enhanced mammography in the preoperative detection of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: a comparison with low-energy image and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wang L; Wang P; Shao H; Li J; Yang Q
    Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3342-3351. PubMed ID: 37853174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
    Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
    Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: Contrast-enhanced mammography versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shahraki Z; Ghaffari M; Nakhaie Moghadam M; Parooie F; Salarzaei M
    Breast Dis; 2022; 41(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 35754256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography for suspicious findings in dense breasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lin ST; Li HJ; Li YZ; Chen QQ; Ye JY; Lin S; Cai SQ; Sun JG
    Cancer Med; 2024 Apr; 13(8):e7128. PubMed ID: 38659408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
    Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast masses with rim enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: morphological and enhancement features for diagnosis and differentiation of benign and malignant.
    Wen C; Wang S; Ma M; Xu Z; Zeng F; Zeng H; Liao X; He Z; Xu W; Chen W
    Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1157):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 38521539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Contrast-enhanced Mammography for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Nissan N; Comstock CE; Sevilimedu V; Gluskin J; Mango VL; Hughes M; Ochoa-Albiztegui RE; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2024 Oct; 313(1):e232580. PubMed ID: 39352285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for Detecting Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparison with Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
    Barra FR; Sobrinho AB; Barra RR; Magalhães MT; Aguiar LR; de Albuquerque GFL; Costa RP; Farage L; Pratesi R
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8531916. PubMed ID: 30533440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of contrast-enhanced mammography in the preoperative evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
    Giannotti E; Van Nijnatten TJA; Chen Y; Bicchierai G; Nori J; De Benedetto D; Lalji U; Lee AHS; James J
    Clin Radiol; 2024 Jun; 79(6):e799-e806. PubMed ID: 38383254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.
    Lawson MB; Partridge SC; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Lam DL; Lee CI; Lowry KP; Scheel JR; Parsian S; Li I; Biswas D; Bryant ML; Lee JM
    Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230576. PubMed ID: 37581498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging.
    Taylor DB; Burrows S; Saunders CM; Parizel PM; Ives A
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Feb; 7(1):8. PubMed ID: 36781808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) compared to Breast Magnetic Resonance (MRI) in the evaluation of breast lobular neoplasia.
    Nicosia L; Rotili A; Pesapane F; Bozzini AC; Battaglia O; Pellegrino G; Fusco N; Porta FM; Frassoni S; Bagnardi V; Corso G; Sangalli C; Cassano E
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jan; 203(1):135-143. PubMed ID: 37787819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Locoregional staging of breast cancer: contrast-enhanced mammography versus breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Terzoni A; Basile P; Gambaro AC; Attanasio S; Rampi AM; Brambilla M; Carriero A
    Radiol Med; 2024 Apr; 129(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 38512618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.