142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38779202)
1. Topography of root-end surface after freehand and three-dimensional-guided apicoectomy procedure: A scanning electron microscope study.
Damor PR; Sharma S; Kumar V; Chawla A; Logani A
J Conserv Dent Endod; 2024 Apr; 27(4):424-428. PubMed ID: 38779202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasonic chemical vapor deposition-coated tip versus high- and low-speed carbide burs for apicoectomy: time required for resection and scanning electron microscopy analysis of the root-end surfaces.
Bernardes RA; de Souza Junior JV; Duarte MA; de Moraes IG; Bramante CM
J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 19166787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of root surfaces of apicected teeth: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation.
Ayranci F; Ayranci LB; Arslan H; Omezli MM; Topcu MC
Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 25665992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative SEM study of the marginal adaptation of MTA and Biodentine after apical resection (in vitro study).
Radeva E; Uzunov T
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2023 Apr; 65(2):269-276. PubMed ID: 37144312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dentinal crack propagation, amount of gutta percha remaining and time required during removal of gutta percha using two different rotary instruments and hand instruments - An
Tejaswi S; Singh A; Manglekar S; Ambikathanaya UK; Shetty S
Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):524-530. PubMed ID: 35439914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Guided modern endodontic microsurgery by use of a trephine bur].
Nagy E; Fráter M; Antal M
Orv Hetil; 2020 Jul; 161(30):1260-1265. PubMed ID: 32653869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of surface roughness after root resection: An optical profilometer study.
Ekici Ö; Aslantaş K; Kanık Ö; Keleş A
Microsc Res Tech; 2021 Apr; 84(4):828-836. PubMed ID: 33491839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the angle of apical resection on apical leakage, measured with a computerized fluid filtration device.
Garip H; Garip Y; Oruçoğlu H; Hatipoğlu S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Mar; 111(3):e50-5. PubMed ID: 21310350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study.
Ashwinkumar V; Krithikadatta J; Surendran S; Velmurugan N
Int Endod J; 2014 Jul; 47(7):622-7. PubMed ID: 24107320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: A Retrospective Outcomes Assessment of 24 Cases.
Buniag AG; Pratt AM; Ray JJ
J Endod; 2021 May; 47(5):762-769. PubMed ID: 33548331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The topography of root ends resected with fissure burs and refined with two types of finishing burs.
Morgan LA; Marshall JG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 May; 85(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 9619679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temperature and time variations during apical resection.
Ekici Ö; Aslantaş K; Kanık Ö; Keles A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2021 Mar; 79(2):156-160. PubMed ID: 33245674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of root-end cavity preparation using ultrasonic retrotips.
Ishikawa H; Sawada N; Kobayashi C; Suda H
Int Endod J; 2003 Sep; 36(9):586-90. PubMed ID: 12950571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Crack formation on resected root surfaces subjected to conventional, ultrasonic, and laser root-end cavity preparation.
Aydemir S; Cimilli H; Mumcu G; Chandler N; Kartal N
Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 Jun; 32(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24742101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectrophotometric analysis evaluating apical microleakage in retrograde filling using GIC, MTA and biodentine: an in-vitro study.
Nepal M; Shubham S; Tripathi R; Khadka J; Kunwar D; Gautam V; Gautam N
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):37. PubMed ID: 32013975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of digitally planned, guided apicoectomy with a conventional trephine and a custom-made endodontic trephine: An in vitro comparative study.
Nagy E; Braunitzer G; Gryschka DG; Barrak I; Antal MA
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 123(4):388-394. PubMed ID: 34601166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Heat Softening versus Ultrasonic Removal of Root-End Gutta-Percha on the Quality of Root-End Preparation for Endodontic Microsurgery.
Ling Z; Zheng Z; Zeng Y; Jiang L; Wu Y; Wu B; Yan W
Scanning; 2021; 2021():8320234. PubMed ID: 34405033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bacterial sealing ability of calcium silicate-based sealer for endodontic surgery: an in-vitro study.
Mansour MM; Moussa SM; Meheissen MA; Aboelseoud MR
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):584. PubMed ID: 38773504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of apical surface roughness after root resection: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Duarte MA; Domingues R; Matsumoto MA; Padovan LE; Kuga MC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):e74-6. PubMed ID: 17942334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sealing ability of MTA and amalgam in different root-end preparations and resection bevel angles: an in vitro evaluation using marginal dye leakage.
Post LK; Lima FG; Xavier CB; Demarco FF; Gerhardt-Oliveira M
Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 21180797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
