These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38780727)

  • 1. RNA Secondary Structure Thermodynamics.
    Lorenz R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2726():45-83. PubMed ID: 38780727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a sophisticated SCFG design for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Nebel ME; Scheid A
    Theory Biosci; 2011 Dec; 130(4):313-36. PubMed ID: 22135038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the free energy in a stochastic RNA secondary structure model.
    Nebel ME; Scheid A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(6):1468-82. PubMed ID: 21116040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the effect of disturbed ensemble distributions on SCFG based statistical sampling of RNA secondary structures.
    Scheid A; Nebel ME
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():159. PubMed ID: 22776037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SCFGs in RNA secondary structure prediction RNA secondary structure prediction: a hands-on approach.
    Sükösd Z; Andersen ES; Lyngsø R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1097():143-62. PubMed ID: 24639159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A range of complex probabilistic models for RNA secondary structure prediction that includes the nearest-neighbor model and more.
    Rivas E; Lang R; Eddy SR
    RNA; 2012 Feb; 18(2):193-212. PubMed ID: 22194308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolving stochastic context--free grammars for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Wj Anderson J; Tataru P; Staines J; Hein J; Lyngsø R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 May; 13():78. PubMed ID: 22559985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CONTRAfold: RNA secondary structure prediction without physics-based models.
    Do CB; Woods DA; Batzoglou S
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e90-8. PubMed ID: 16873527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient algorithms for probing the RNA mutation landscape.
    Waldispühl J; Devadas S; Berger B; Clote P
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Aug; 4(8):e1000124. PubMed ID: 18688270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A statistical sampling algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Ding Y; Lawrence CE
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2003 Dec; 31(24):7280-301. PubMed ID: 14654704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of several lightweight stochastic context-free grammars for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Dowell RD; Eddy SR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Jun; 5():71. PubMed ID: 15180907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Crumple: a method for complete enumeration of all possible pseudoknot-free RNA secondary structures.
    Bleckley S; Stone JW; Schroeder SJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52414. PubMed ID: 23300665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of RNA secondary structure by free energy minimization.
    Mathews DH; Turner DH
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2006 Jun; 16(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 16713706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introduction to stochastic context free grammars.
    Giegerich R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1097():85-106. PubMed ID: 24639156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RNA pseudoknot prediction in energy-based models.
    Lyngsø RB; Pedersen CN
    J Comput Biol; 2000; 7(3-4):409-27. PubMed ID: 11108471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving RNA nearest neighbor parameters for helices by going beyond the two-state model.
    Spasic A; Berger KD; Chen JL; Seetin MG; Turner DH; Mathews DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jun; 46(10):4883-4892. PubMed ID: 29718397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterising RNA secondary structure space using information entropy.
    Sükösd Z; Knudsen B; Anderson JW; Novák A; Kjems J; Pedersen CN
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S22. PubMed ID: 23368905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partition function and base pairing probabilities for RNA-RNA interaction prediction.
    Huang FW; Qin J; Reidys CM; Stadler PF
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 25(20):2646-54. PubMed ID: 19671692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Unified Dynamic Programming Framework for the Analysis of Interacting Nucleic Acid Strands: Enhanced Models, Scalability, and Speed.
    Fornace ME; Porubsky NJ; Pierce NA
    ACS Synth Biol; 2020 Oct; 9(10):2665-2678. PubMed ID: 32910644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thermodynamics of RNA structures by Wang-Landau sampling.
    Lou F; Clote P
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i278-86. PubMed ID: 20529917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.