146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38780820)
1. Back to the Roots: Reconstructing Large and Complex Cranial Defects using an Image-based Statistical Shape Model.
Li J; Ellis DG; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Aizenberg MR; Kleesiek J; Egger J
J Med Syst; 2024 May; 48(1):55. PubMed ID: 38780820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic skull defect restoration and cranial implant generation for cranioplasty.
Li J; von Campe G; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Wang E; Chen X; Zefferer U; Tödtling M; Krall M; Deutschmann H; Schäfer U; Schmalstieg D; Egger J
Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102171. PubMed ID: 34340106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics.
Fuessinger MA; Schwarz S; Cornelius CP; Metzger MC; Ellis E; Probst F; Semper-Hogg W; Gass M; Schlager S
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Apr; 13(4):519-529. PubMed ID: 29080945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards clinical applicability and computational efficiency in automatic cranial implant design: An overview of the AutoImplant 2021 cranial implant design challenge.
Li J; Ellis DG; Kodym O; Rauschenbach L; Rieß C; Sure U; Wrede KH; Alvarez CM; Wodzinski M; Daniol M; Hemmerling D; Mahdi H; Clement A; Kim E; Fishman Z; Whyne CM; Mainprize JG; Hardisty MR; Pathak S; Sindhura C; Gorthi RKSS; Kiran DV; Gorthi S; Yang B; Fang K; Li X; Kroviakov A; Yu L; Jin Y; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Herout A; Alves V; Španěl M; Aizenberg MR; Kleesiek J; Egger J
Med Image Anal; 2023 Aug; 88():102865. PubMed ID: 37331241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep learning for cranioplasty in clinical practice: Going from synthetic to real patient data.
Kodym O; Španěl M; Herout A
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Oct; 137():104766. PubMed ID: 34425418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sparse convolutional neural network for high-resolution skull shape completion and shape super-resolution.
Li J; Gsaxner C; Pepe A; Schmalstieg D; Kleesiek J; Egger J
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20229. PubMed ID: 37981641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Next-generation personalized cranioplasty treatment.
Thimukonda Jegadeesan J; Baldia M; Basu B
Acta Biomater; 2022 Dec; 154():63-82. PubMed ID: 36272686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skull shape reconstruction using cascaded convolutional networks.
Kodym O; Španěl M; Herout A
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Aug; 123():103886. PubMed ID: 32658793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model.
Gass M; Füßinger MA; Metzger MC; Schwarz S; Bähr JD; Brandenburg L; Weingart J; Schlager S
J Anat; 2022 Feb; 240(2):323-329. PubMed ID: 34658032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional reconstruction of cranial defect using active contour model and image registration.
Liao YL; Lu CF; Sun YN; Wu CT; Lee JD; Lee ST; Wu YT
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Feb; 49(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 21128121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thickness and design features of clinical cranial implants-what should automated methods strive to replicate?
Fishman Z; Mainprize JG; Edwards G; Antonyshyn O; Hardisty M; Whyne CM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 Apr; 19(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 38430381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional deep learning to automatically generate cranial implant geometry.
Wu CT; Yang YH; Chang YZ
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2683. PubMed ID: 35177704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The "springform" technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants.
Pöppe JP; Spendel M; Schwartz C; Winkler PA; Wittig J
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Mar; 164(3):679-688. PubMed ID: 34873659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical results of cranioplasty with a polymethylmethacrylate customized cranial implant in pediatric patients: a single-center experience.
Fiaschi P; Pavanello M; Imperato A; Dallolio V; Accogli A; Capra V; Consales A; Cama A; Piatelli G
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2016 Jun; 17(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 26824593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Customised fabricated implants after previous failed cranioplasty.
Goh RC; Chang CN; Lin CL; Lo LJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Sep; 63(9):1479-84. PubMed ID: 19766072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study].
Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies.
Tantawi D; Armonda R; Valerio I; Kumar AR
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. PubMed ID: 23154344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning-based framework for automatic cranial defect reconstruction and implant modeling.
Wodzinski M; Daniol M; Socha M; Hemmerling D; Stanuch M; Skalski A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Nov; 226():107173. PubMed ID: 36257198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted single-stage cranioplasty.
Murphy RJ; Wolfe KC; Liacouras PC; Grant GT; Gordon CR; Armand M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():4910-3. PubMed ID: 26737393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
