These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 387809)

  • 1. API and Minitek systems in identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and Clostridium species.
    Hanson CW; Cassorla R; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Jul; 10(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 387809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.
    Hansen SL; Stewart BJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Sep; 4(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Minitek Anaerobe II, API An-Ident, and RapID ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.
    Bate G
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jun; 85(6):716-8. PubMed ID: 3518405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Minitek system with conventional methods for identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative gram-negative bacilli.
    Wellstood-Nuesse S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Apr; 9(4):511-6. PubMed ID: 379041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the new RapID-ANA II system for the identification of clinical anaerobic isolates.
    Marler LM; Siders JA; Wolters LC; Pettigrew Y; Skitt BL; Allen SD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):874-8. PubMed ID: 2056052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of API ZYM system with API AN-Ident, API 20A, Minitek Anaerobe II, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.
    Head CB; Ratnam S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Jan; 26(1):144-6. PubMed ID: 3277989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of spot esculin hydrolysis with the PathoTec strip test for rapid differentiation of anaerobic bacteria.
    Qadri SM; Johnson S; Smith JC; Zubairi S; Gillum RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 7016896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of four commercial systems for the identification of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.
    Burdash NM; Bannister ER; Manos JP; West ME
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Apr; 73(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 6989231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the RapID ANA system as a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.
    Downes J; Andrew JH
    Pathology; 1988 Jul; 20(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 3060822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Anaerobe identification system.
    Cavallaro JJ; Wiggs LS; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3186-91. PubMed ID: 9399517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid enzymatic characterization of clinically encountered anaerobic bacteria with the API ZYM system.
    Marler L; Allen S; Siders J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 3(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 6386457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
    Bergan T; Vangdal M; Salveson A
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Minitek system for direct identification of anaerobic rods from positive blood cultures.
    Polomski JC; McClatchey KD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):673-5. PubMed ID: 6759525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of the Vitek ANI card for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Schreckenberger PC; Celig DM; Janda WM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 3343321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The characterization of clinically important gram negative anaerobic bacilli by conventional bacteriological tests.
    Duerden BI; Holbrook WP; Collee JG; Watt B
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1976 Apr; 40(2):163-88. PubMed ID: 773916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence of gram negative anaerobic bacilli in routine clinical specimens.
    De A; Gogate A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 44(4):435-8. PubMed ID: 12035357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The identification of gram-negative anaerobic bacilli isolated from clinical infections.
    Duerden BI
    J Hyg (Lond); 1980 Apr; 84(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 6987300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of RapID-ANA and Minitek with a conventional method for biochemical identification of anaerobes.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Schieven BC; Stoakes L; Kelly T; Groves D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 May; 7(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 3319374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC; Kaufmann CS; Keifer JC; Venbrux HJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 6355150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.