123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38781877)
21. Improving the effectiveness of watershed environmental management-dynamic coordination through government pollution control and resident participation.
Cheng C; Fang Z; Zhou Q; Wang Y; Li N; Zhou H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(20):57862-57881. PubMed ID: 36971944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Changing Factors Affecting Local Environmental Governance in China: Evidence from a Study of Prefecture-Level Cities in Guangdong Province.
Yang J; Xue D; Huang G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32443692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of fiscal decentralization on firm environmental performance: evidence from a county-level fiscal reform in China.
Wen H; Lee CC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(29):36147-36159. PubMed ID: 32556975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of environmental regulation on air pollution, productivity, and factor structure: a quasi-natural experiment evidence from China.
Zhang N; Zhao K; Yu Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(16):20392-20409. PubMed ID: 32240512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How public environmental appeals affect the collaborative governance in pollution and carbon reduction: Evidence from spatial effects across Chinese cities.
Zhao N; Jin M; Qiu Z; Zhou J; Liu B
Environ Res; 2024 Sep; 256():119249. PubMed ID: 38810831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effectiveness evaluation on third-party governance model for environmental pollution in China.
Zhou W; Chen L; Feng L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(17):17305-17320. PubMed ID: 31020529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Do Authoritarian Governments Respond to Public Opinion on the Environment? Evidence from China.
Tang X; Chen W; Wu T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 29401701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do environmental target constraints of local government affect high-quality economic development? Evidence from China.
Fu Y; Zhuang H; Zhang X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(19):56620-56640. PubMed ID: 36920602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing Chinese governance low-carbon economic peer effects in local government and under sustainable environmental regulation.
Liu H; Zhou R; Yao P; Zhang J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(22):61304-61323. PubMed ID: 34988798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does national air quality monitoring reduce local air pollution? The case of PM
Liu G; Dong X; Kong Z; Dong K
J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 296():113232. PubMed ID: 34246901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pollution or innovation? How enterprises react to air pollution under perfect information.
Sun Y; Hu H; Jin G
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 831():154821. PubMed ID: 35346714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Government-Enterprise Collusion and the Effectiveness of Environmental Regulations: Implications for Public Health.
Zhao S; Peng L; Zhou H; Hu F
J Environ Public Health; 2023; 2023():3958944. PubMed ID: 36816820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Empirical Study on the Impact of Government Environmental Subsidies on Environmental Performance of Heavily Polluting Enterprises Based on the Regulating Effect of Internal Control.
Pei W; Pei W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An evolutionary game study on the collaborative governance of environmental pollution: from the perspective of regulatory capture.
Hu Z; Wang Y; Zhang H; Liao W; Tao T
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1320072. PubMed ID: 38249382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do local governments' energy-saving target constraints inhibit financialization? Evidence from nonfinancial listed firms in China.
Hu G; Yu Y; Wang Q
PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285342. PubMed ID: 37205686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does Smart City Construction Reduce Haze Pollution?
Wang L; Xie Q; Xue F; Li Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can Marketization of Environmental Governance Improve Public Health?-Empirical Analysis Based on the Emission Trading System.
Huang Y; Li S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does vertical supervision promote regional green transformation? Evidence from Central Environmental Protection Inspection.
Zeng M; Zheng L; Huang Z; Cheng X; Zeng H
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 326(Pt A):116681. PubMed ID: 36384056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Coping with waste: A government-NGO collaborative governance approach in Shanghai.
Arantes V; Zou C; Che Y
J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 259():109653. PubMed ID: 32072942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Dilemma and Path of Rural Environmental Governance in China: From the Perspective of a Community with a Shared Future.
Zhang Y; Guo X
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36674201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
