118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38782403)
1. Comparative Metabolomics and Microbiome Analysis of Ethanol versus OMNImet/gene•GUT Fecal Stabilization.
Isokääntä H; Pinto da Silva L; Karu N; Kallonen T; Aatsinki AK; Hankemeier T; Schimmel L; Diaz E; Hyötyläinen T; Dorrestein PC; Knight R; Orešič M; Kaddurah-Daouk R; Dickens AM; Lamichhane S
Anal Chem; 2024 Jun; 96(22):8893-8904. PubMed ID: 38782403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in microbiome and metabolomic profiles of fecal samples stored with stabilizing solution at room temperature: a pilot study.
Lim MY; Hong S; Kim BM; Ahn Y; Kim HJ; Nam YD
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):1789. PubMed ID: 32019987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance comparison of fecal preservative and stock solutions for gut microbiome storage at room temperature.
Park C; Yun KE; Chu JM; Lee JY; Hong CP; Nam YD; Jeong J; Han K; Ahn YJ
J Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 58(8):703-710. PubMed ID: 32583287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pivotal interplays between fecal metabolome and gut microbiome reveal functional signatures in cerebral ischemic stroke.
Zhao L; Wang C; Peng S; Zhu X; Zhang Z; Zhao Y; Zhang J; Zhao G; Zhang T; Heng X; Zhang L
J Transl Med; 2022 Oct; 20(1):459. PubMed ID: 36209079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fitness for purpose of stabilized stool samples for bile acid metabolite analyses.
Neuberger-Castillo L; Ammerlaan W; Betsou F
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7904. PubMed ID: 33846363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of stabilization methods for the immediate and short-term preservation of bovine fecal and upper respiratory tract genomic DNA.
Pinnell LJ; Wolfe CA; Castle J; Crosby WB; Doster E; Morley PS
PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0300285. PubMed ID: 38564604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term stability of microbiome diversity and composition in fecal samples stored in eNAT medium.
Young RR; Jenkins K; Araujo-Perez F; Seed PC; Kelly MS
Microbiologyopen; 2020 Jul; 9(7):e1046. PubMed ID: 32390344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of time and temperature on gut microbiota and SCFA composition in stool samples.
Cunningham JL; Bramstång L; Singh A; Jayarathna S; Rasmusson AJ; Moazzami A; Müller B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236944. PubMed ID: 32745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples.
Kim JH; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Ha N; Kim JK; Moon SJ; Kim MG
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):114. PubMed ID: 36596832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gut Microbial Ecosystem in Parkinson Disease: New Clinicobiological Insights from Multi-Omics.
Tan AH; Chong CW; Lim SY; Yap IKS; Teh CSJ; Loke MF; Song SL; Tan JY; Ang BH; Tan YQ; Kho MT; Bowman J; Mahadeva S; Yong HS; Lang AE
Ann Neurol; 2021 Mar; 89(3):546-559. PubMed ID: 33274480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Method Validation for Extraction of DNA from Human Stool Samples for Downstream Microbiome Analysis.
Neuberger-Castillo L; Hamot G; Marchese M; Sanchez I; Ammerlaan W; Betsou F
Biopreserv Biobank; 2020 Apr; 18(2):102-116. PubMed ID: 31999474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles.
Chen CC; Wu WK; Chang CM; Panyod S; Lu TP; Liou JM; Fang YJ; Chuang EY; Wu MS
J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Dec; 119(12):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 32111519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes of gut microbiome composition and metabolites associated with hypertensive heart failure rats.
Li L; Zhong SJ; Hu SY; Cheng B; Qiu H; Hu ZX
BMC Microbiol; 2021 May; 21(1):141. PubMed ID: 33952214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
