118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38782403)
21. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combining fecal microbiome and metabolomics reveals diagnostic biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Gao M; Wu J; Zhou S; Chen Y; Wang M; He W; Jiang L; Shu Y; Wang X
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 May; 12(5):e0401223. PubMed ID: 38497715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reproducibility, stability, and accuracy of microbial profiles by fecal sample collection method in three distinct populations.
Byrd DA; Chen J; Vogtmann E; Hullings A; Song SJ; Amir A; Kibriya MG; Ahsan H; Chen Y; Nelson H; Knight R; Shi J; Chia N; Sinha R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224757. PubMed ID: 31738775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The unique composition of Indian gut microbiome, gene catalogue, and associated fecal metabolome deciphered using multi-omics approaches.
Dhakan DB; Maji A; Sharma AK; Saxena R; Pulikkan J; Grace T; Gomez A; Scaria J; Amato KR; Sharma VK
Gigascience; 2019 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 30698687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Gut microbiome analysis by post: Evaluation of the optimal method to collect stool samples from infants within a national cohort study.
Williams GM; Leary SD; Ajami NJ; Chipper Keating S; Petrosin JF; Hamilton-Shield JP; Gillespie KM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0216557. PubMed ID: 31188837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fecal sample collection methods and time of day impact microbiome composition and short chain fatty acid concentrations.
Jones J; Reinke SN; Ali A; Palmer DJ; Christophersen CT
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13964. PubMed ID: 34234185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.
Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection.
Dominianni C; Wu J; Hayes RB; Ahn J
BMC Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 14():103. PubMed ID: 24758293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fecal and serum metabolomic signatures and gut microbiota characteristics of allergic rhinitis mice model.
Chen Z; He S; Wei Y; Liu Y; Xu Q; Lin X; Chen C; Lin W; Wang Y; Li L; Xu Y
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2023; 13():1150043. PubMed ID: 37180443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fecal Metabolomic Signatures in Colorectal Adenoma Patients Are Associated with Gut Microbiota and Early Events of Colorectal Cancer Pathogenesis.
Kim M; Vogtmann E; Ahlquist DA; Devens ME; Kisiel JB; Taylor WR; White BA; Hale VL; Sung J; Chia N; Sinha R; Chen J
mBio; 2020 Feb; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 32071266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative methods for fecal sample storage to preserve gut microbial structure and function in an in vitro model of the human colon.
Deschamps C; Fournier E; Uriot O; Lajoie F; Verdier C; Comtet-Marre S; Thomas M; Kapel N; Cherbuy C; Alric M; Almeida M; Etienne-Mesmin L; Blanquet-Diot S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 104(23):10233-10247. PubMed ID: 33085024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Microbiome and Metabolome of Preterm Infant Stool Are Personalized and Not Driven by Health Outcomes, Including Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Late-Onset Sepsis.
Wandro S; Osborne S; Enriquez C; Bixby C; Arrieta A; Whiteson K
mSphere; 2018 Jun; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 29875143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of stool collection and storage conditions for in vitro human gut model studies.
Newland GAI; Gibson GR; Jackson FL; Wijeyesekera A
J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Jun; 185():106230. PubMed ID: 33933521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples for Discovery Metabolomics in Epidemiologic Studies.
Loftfield E; Vogtmann E; Sampson JN; Moore SC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Sinha R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Nov; 25(11):1483-1490. PubMed ID: 27543620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.
Short MI; Hudson R; Besasie BD; Reveles KR; Shah DP; Nicholson S; Johnson-Pais TL; Weldon K; Lai Z; Leach RJ; Fongang B; Liss MA
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):26. PubMed ID: 33446094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of storage conditions on the human stool metabolome and lipidome: Preserving the most accurate fingerprint.
De Spiegeleer M; De Graeve M; Huysman S; Vanderbeke A; Van Meulebroek L; Vanhaecke L
Anal Chim Acta; 2020 Apr; 1108():79-88. PubMed ID: 32222247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
