114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38782675)
1. A novel nomogram to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in MR assisted lesion biopsies: Turkish urooncology association nomogram.
Şahin B; Çetin S; Sözen S; Aslan G; Çelik S; Türkeri L
Urol Oncol; 2024 Sep; 42(9):288.e17-288.e25. PubMed ID: 38782675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.
Zhou Z; Liang Z; Zuo Y; Zhou Y; Yan W; Wu X; Ji Z; Li H; Hu M; Ma L
Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 35098557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram.
Bjurlin MA; Renson A; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong M; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Taneja SS
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):815-822. PubMed ID: 29802053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of false-positive PI-RADS 5 lesions on prostate multiparametric MRI: development and internal validation of a clinical-radiological characteristics based nomogram.
Cheng Y; Fan B; Fu Y; Yin H; Lu J; Li D; Li X; Qiu X; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 38566091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.
Niu XK; Li J; Das SK; Xiong Y; Yang CB; Peng T
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 28143433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of nomogram to improve the specificity of multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer.
Shiekh M; Houenstein H; Ramahi YO; Shabir U; Ghadersohi S; Zhu D; Zhu M; Jing Z; Attwood K; Kauffman E; Aboumohamed A; Guru K; Hussein AA
Int J Urol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):876-882. PubMed ID: 37329258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinico-radiological characteristic-based machine learning in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies of PI-RADS 3 lesions with dual validation.
Kan Y; Zhang Q; Hao J; Wang W; Zhuang J; Gao J; Huang H; Liang J; Marra G; Calleris G; Oderda M; Zhao X; Gontero P; Guo H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6274-6284. PubMed ID: 32524222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study.
Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Fu P; Mahran A; Rastinehad AR; Tewari A; Tirumani SH; Purysko A; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Jul; 3(7):e445-e454. PubMed ID: 34167765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.
Washino S; Okochi T; Saito K; Konishi T; Hirai M; Kobayashi Y; Miyagawa T
BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 26935594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploration of the diagnostic capacity of PSAMR combined with PI-RADS scoring for clinically significant prostate cancer and establishment and validation of the Nomogram prediction model.
Li D; Zhang L; Xu Y; Wu X; Hua S; Jiang Y; Huang Q; Gao Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Oct; 149(13):11309-11317. PubMed ID: 37365430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate-specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Multicenter Evaluation.
Chiu PK; Leow JJ; Chiang CH; Mok A; Zhang K; Hsieh PF; Zhu Y; Lam W; Tsang WC; Fan YH; Lin TP; Chan TY; Leung CH; Teoh JY; Chu PS; Zhu G; Ye DW; Wu HC; Tan TW; Tsu JH; Ng CF; Chiong E; Huang CY
J Urol; 2023 Jul; 210(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 37036248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of a novel nomogram predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men based on multi-institutional analysis.
Ge Q; Zhang S; Xu H; Zhang J; Fan Z; Li W; Shen D; Xiao J; Wei Z
Cancer Med; 2023 Dec; 12(24):21820-21829. PubMed ID: 38014481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Developing a Chinese PI-RADS v2-based nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with a prior negative biopsy].
Huang C; Song G; Wang H; Ji GJ; Chen YK; He Q; Zhou LQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 98(32):2559-2563. PubMed ID: 30220139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive clinical features for negative histopathology of MRI/Ultrasound-fusion-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high likelihood of cancer at prostate MRI: Analysis from a urologic outpatient clinic1.
Apfelbeck M; Pfitzinger P; Bischoff R; Rath L; Buchner A; Mumm JN; Schlenker B; Stief CG; Chaloupka M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 33337358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.
Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis.
Avolio PP; Lughezzani G; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Uleri A; Frego N; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Saita A; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):832.e1-832.e7. PubMed ID: 34183255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.
Wagaskar VG; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Young J; Lantz A; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1357. PubMed ID: 33661541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.
Hansen NL; Kesch C; Barrett T; Koo B; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Schlemmer HP; Warren AY; Wieczorek K; Hohenfellner M; Kastner C; Hadaschik B
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):631-638. PubMed ID: 27862869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
