151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38782976)
1. Assessment of image quality and impact of deep learning-based software in non-contrast head CT scans.
Bos D; Demircioğlu A; Neuhoff J; Haubold J; Zensen S; Opitz MK; Drews MA; Li Y; Styczen H; Forsting M; Nassenstein K
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11810. PubMed ID: 38782976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of a novel deep-learning based reconstruction software on the objective and subjective image quality in low-dose abdominal computed tomography.
Steuwe A; Weber M; Bethge OT; Rademacher C; Boschheidgen M; Sawicki LM; Antoch G; Aissa J
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 94(1117):20200677. PubMed ID: 33095654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-Dose Abdominal CT Using a Deep Learning-Based Denoising Algorithm: A Comparison with CT Reconstructed with Filtered Back Projection or Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Shin YJ; Chang W; Ye JC; Kang E; Oh DY; Lee YJ; Park JH; Kim YH
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 21(3):356-364. PubMed ID: 32090528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superior objective and subjective image quality of deep learning reconstruction for low-dose abdominal CT imaging in comparison with model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.
Tamura A; Mukaida E; Ota Y; Kamata M; Abe S; Yoshioka K
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20201357. PubMed ID: 34142867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm in ultralow-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: evaluation of radiation dose reduction, image quality, and diagnostic performance.
Park SB; Kim YS; Lee JB; Park HJ
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3137-46. PubMed ID: 26197735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Fourth Generation Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Standard Filtered Back Projection in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Examinations.
Thomas AK; Southard R; Curran J; Augustyn R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(3):475-481. PubMed ID: 29189401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep learning imaging reconstruction of reduced-dose 40 keV virtual monoenergetic imaging for early detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Li S; Yuan L; Lu T; Yang X; Ren W; Wang L; Zhao J; Deng J; Liu X; Xue C; Sun Q; Zhang W; Zhou J
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111128. PubMed ID: 37816301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image Quality and Lesion Detectability of Pancreatic Phase Thin-Slice Computed Tomography Images With a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm.
Nakamoto A; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Fukui H; Ota T; Ogawa K; Yano K; Kiso K; Honda T; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 47(5):698-703. PubMed ID: 37707398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Raw-data-based iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection: image quality of low-dose chest computed tomography examinations in 87 patients.
Wang H; Tan B; Zhao B; Liang C; Xu Z
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(6):1024-32. PubMed ID: 23916244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning reconstruction CT for liver metastases: low-dose dual-energy vs standard-dose single-energy.
Lyu P; Li Z; Chen Y; Wang H; Liu N; Liu J; Zhan P; Liu X; Shang B; Wang L; Gao J
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 37532899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of deep learning reconstruction on abdominal CT densitometry and image quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Stiphout JA; Driessen J; Koetzier LR; Ruules LB; Willemink MJ; Heemskerk JWT; van der Molen AJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):2921-2929. PubMed ID: 34913104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging using a new deep learning image reconstruction technique in children compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASiR-V).
Li Y; Liu X; Zhuang XH; Wang MJ; Song XF
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Jun; 22(1):106. PubMed ID: 35658908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep learning reconstruction vs standard reconstruction for abdominal CT: the influence of BMI.
Wang H; Yue S; Liu N; Chen Y; Zhan P; Liu X; Shang B; Wang L; Li Z; Gao J; Lyu P
Eur Radiol; 2024 Mar; 34(3):1614-1623. PubMed ID: 37650972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep learning image reconstruction for improvement of image quality of abdominal computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Ichikawa Y; Kanii Y; Yamazaki A; Nagasawa N; Nagata M; Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Sakuma H
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 33449305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of image noise and image quality between full-dose abdominal computed tomography scans reconstructed with weighted filtered back projection and half-dose scans reconstructed with improved sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE*).
Choy S; Parhar D; Lian K; Schmiedeskamp H; Louis L; O'Connell T; McLaughlin P; Nicolaou S
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jan; 44(1):355-361. PubMed ID: 29980828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How far can the radiation dose be lowered in head CT with iterative reconstruction? Analysis of imaging quality and diagnostic accuracy.
Wu TH; Hung SC; Sun JY; Lin CJ; Lin CH; Chiu CF; Liu MJ; Teng MM; Guo WY; Chang CY
Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2612-21. PubMed ID: 23645331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study.
Park HJ; Choi SY; Lee JE; Lim S; Lee MH; Yi BH; Cha JG; Min JH; Lee B; Jung Y
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):3974-3984. PubMed ID: 35064803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can 1.25 mm thin-section images generated with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction technique replace standard-of-care 5 mm images in abdominal CT?
Cao J; Mroueh N; Pisuchpen N; Parakh A; Lennartz S; Pierce TT; Kambadakone AR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Oct; 48(10):3253-3264. PubMed ID: 37369922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
