93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3878409)
21. [Type and incidence of abnormalities in 23,939 newborn infants in a 5-year period].
Rosanelli K; Rosegger H; Zeichen HL; Zierler H
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Sep; 98(18):609-13. PubMed ID: 3491463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Antepartum management protocol. Timing and mode of delivery in gestational diabetes.
Hod M; Bar J; Peled Y; Fried S; Katz I; Itzhak M; Ashkenazi S; Schindel B; Ben-Rafael Z
Diabetes Care; 1998 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():B113-7. PubMed ID: 9704237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Caesarean section in the management of singleton breech delivery in Calabar, Nigeria.
Abasiattai AM; Bassey EA; Etuk SJ; Udoma EJ; Ekanem AD
Niger J Clin Pract; 2006 Jun; 9(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 16986285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants.
Rietberg CC; Elferink-Stinkens PM; Brand R; van Loon AJ; Van Hemel OJ; Visser GH
BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 12798480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Choice of delivery methods for cases of breech presentation, with particular reference to premature birth (author's transl)].
Ruckhäberle KE; Viehweg B; Vogtmann C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1982; 104(9):539-49. PubMed ID: 7113520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prenatal diagnosis in Italy.
Clerici G; Donti E; Zacutti A; Di Renzo GC
Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 9101178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Neonatal outcome after a planned vaginal breech birth: no association with parity or birth weight, but more birth injuries than in planned cesarean section].
Brouwer WK; Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven AL; Santema JG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Aug; 145(32):1554-7. PubMed ID: 11525090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Breech delivery and intelligence: a population-based study of 8,738 breech infants.
Eide MG; Øyen N; Skjaerven R; Irgens LM; Bjerkedal T; Nilsen ST
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 105(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 15625134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium.
Goffinet F; Carayol M; Foidart JM; Alexander S; Uzan S; Subtil D; Bréart G;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 194(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 16580289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Secular trends in peri- and neonatal mortality in breech presentation; Norway 1967-1994.
Albrechtsen S; Rasmussen S; Irgens LM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jun; 79(6):508-12. PubMed ID: 10857877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Planned vaginal delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: prenatal determinants predictive of elevated risk of cesarean delivery during labor.
Roman H; Carayol M; Watier L; Le Ray C; Breart G; Goffinet F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 May; 138(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 17689853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [What effect does leg position in breech presentation have on mode of delivery and early neonatal morbidity?].
Krause M; Fischer T; Feige A
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1997; 201(4):128-35. PubMed ID: 9410517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breech presentation and fetal growth retardation.
Zhang J; Schwingl PJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 8487236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prenatal diagnosis and management of congenital heart defect: significance of associated fetal anomalies and prenatal chromosome studies.
Wladimiroff JW; Stewart PA; Sachs ES; Niermeijer MF
Am J Med Genet; 1985 Jun; 21(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 3893127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Fetal risk in breech delivery].
Caserta R; Balbi C; Borrelli AL; Di Jonno F
Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1981; 86(1-2):3-9. PubMed ID: 7346036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors influencing delivery method in breech presentation.
Albrechtsen S; Rasmussen S; Dalaker K; Irgens LM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Apr; 77(4):416-21. PubMed ID: 9598950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prenatal management of the fetus with lethal malformation: from a study of oligohydramnios sequence.
Nagase H; Ishikawa H; Nishikawa T; Kurosawa K; Itani Y; Yamanaka M
Fetal Pediatr Pathol; 2011; 30(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 21355684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Congenital anomalies in breech presentation: A nationwide record linkage study.
Macharey G; Gissler M; Toijonen A; Heinonen S; Seikku L
Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2021 Jul; 61(4):112-117. PubMed ID: 33559256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy on the relative incidence of malformations at birth among Jews and Muslim Arabs in Israel.
Zlotogora J; Haklai Z; Rotem N; Georgi M; Rubin L
Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Sep; 12(9):539-42. PubMed ID: 21287797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
