These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38784871)

  • 1. A Long-term Comparison of Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bioabsorbable Interference Screw and Endobutton on Femur.
    Kumar NN; Halbhavi MR; Gouthamraj H; Kumar TNS; Shivanna HY; Sahana VK
    J Orthop Case Rep; 2024 May; 14(5):166-175. PubMed ID: 38784871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Debieux P; Franciozi CE; Lenza M; Tamaoki MJ; Magnussen RA; Faloppa F; Belloti JC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jul; 7(7):CD009772. PubMed ID: 27450741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Graft Fixation Methods on Revision Rates After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Eysturoy NH; Nissen KA; Nielsen T; Lind M
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Mar; 46(3):524-530. PubMed ID: 29337596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation.
    Ma CB; Francis K; Towers J; Irrgang J; Fu FH; Harner CH
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Feb; 20(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 14760343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome of double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using crosspin and aperture fixation.
    Joshi D; Jain V; Goyal A; Bahl V; Modi P; Chaudhary D
    Indian J Orthop; 2014 Jan; 48(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 24600062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized computed tomography--based study comparing 2 different femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft.
    Sabat D; Kundu K; Arora S; Kumar V
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Jun; 27(6):776-83. PubMed ID: 21624672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Results of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Full Tibial Tunnel: Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Quadrupled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw and Staple Fixation.
    Mahirogullari M; Kehribar L; Surucu S; Kayaalp ME; Yilmaz AK; Aydin M
    J Knee Surg; 2023 Aug; 36(10):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 35820431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior Laxity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Comparable When Using Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation.
    Boutsiadis A; Panisset JC; Devitt BM; Mauris F; Barthelemy R; Barth J
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Aug; 46(10):2366-2375. PubMed ID: 30015501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation.
    Monaco E; Fabbri M; Redler A; Gaj E; De Carli A; Argento G; Saithna A; Ferretti A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Aug; 27(8):2577-2584. PubMed ID: 30406408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with different fixation techniques: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside technique with suspensory cortical buttons. 5-year data from a prospective randomized trial.
    Eichinger M; Ploner M; Degenhart G; Rudisch A; Smekal V; Attal R; Mayr R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Nov; 143(11):6707-6718. PubMed ID: 37542556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tunnel enlargement 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic and functional evaluation.
    Dave LY; Leong OK; Karim SA; Chong CH
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Feb; 24(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 23412316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical results of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of femoral knot/press-fit fixation and interference screw fixation.
    Ho WP; Lee CH; Huang CH; Chen CH; Chuang TY
    Arthroscopy; 2014 Jul; 30(7):823-32. PubMed ID: 24768467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suspensory Versus Aperture Fixation of a Quadrupled Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.
    Browning WM; Kluczynski MA; Curatolo C; Marzo JM
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Aug; 45(10):2418-2427. PubMed ID: 28068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical Suspensory Button Versus Aperture Interference Screw Fixation for Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft-Tissue Allograft: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Lubowitz JH; Schwartzberg R; Smith P
    Arthroscopy; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1733-9. PubMed ID: 25911394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suspensory Versus Interference Tibial Fixation of Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry.
    Rahardja R; Love H; Clatworthy MG; Monk AP; Young SW
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Mar; 50(4):904-911. PubMed ID: 35048720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft: a retrospective comparison of tunnel widening upon use of two different femoral fixation methods.
    Mermerkaya MU; Atay OA; Kaymaz B; Bekmez S; Karaaslan F; Doral MN
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Aug; 23(8):2283-2291. PubMed ID: 24819176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Results in Greater Tibial Tunnel Widening Compared to Interference Screw Fixation in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Lee TJ; Jang KM; Kim TJ; Lee SM; Bae JH
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Sep; 58(9):. PubMed ID: 36143870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation and comparison of clinical results of femoral fixation devices in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Aydin D; Ozcan M
    Knee; 2016 Mar; 23(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 25937093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graft-bone motion and tensile properties of hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament femoral graft fixation under cyclic loading.
    Brown CH; Wilson DR; Hecker AT; Ferragamo M
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Nov; 20(9):922-35. PubMed ID: 15525925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intratunnel versus extratunnel autologous hamstring double-bundle graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of 2 femoral fixation procedures.
    Ibrahim SA; Abdul Ghafar S; Marwan Y; Mahgoub AM; Al Misfer A; Farouk H; Wagdy M; Alherran H; Khirait S
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 25349264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.