BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38785496)

  • 1. Trends in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Management in the US: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
    Wolf J; Wu Y; Hayek J; Zhang Q; Alagkiozidis I
    Curr Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):2836-2845. PubMed ID: 38785496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
    Frumovitz M; Obermair A; Coleman RL; Pareja R; Lopez A; Ribero R; Isla D; Rendon G; Bernardini MQ; Buda A; Moretti-Marquez R; Zevallos A; Vieira MA; Zhu T; Land RP; Nicklin J; Asher R; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Ramirez PT
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):851-860. PubMed ID: 32502445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regional trends of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and exploration of perioperative outcomes.
    Holtzman S; Chaoul J; Finkelstein M; Kolev V; Zakashansky K
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 77():102095. PubMed ID: 35078009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
    Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
    Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States.
    Matsuo K; Mandelbaum RS; Klar M; Ciesielski KM; Matsushima K; Matsuzaki S; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 33992450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for women with stage 1A1 and stage 1A2 cervical cancer: A retrospective database cohort study.
    Hayek J; Mowzoon M; Demissie S; Palileo A; Serur E; Goldberg GL; Alagkiozidis I
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2022 May; 77():103507. PubMed ID: 35638032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Melamed A; Margul DJ; Chen L; Keating NL; Del Carmen MG; Yang J; Seagle BL; Alexander A; Barber EL; Rice LW; Wright JD; Kocherginsky M; Shahabi S; Rauh-Hain JA
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 30379613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for stage IA cervical carcinoma: a survival analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Nasioudis D; Byrne M; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Cory L; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Latif NA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Aug; 31(8):1099-1103. PubMed ID: 33962993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Australian, single-centre study of surgical management outcomes for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Weishaupt J; Saidi S; Carter J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 61(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 33176013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Management of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Pennington KP; Urban RR; Gray HJ
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2019 Jan; 17(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 30659132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in Use and Effect on Survival of Simple Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Sia TY; Chen L; Melamed A; Tergas AI; Khoury-Collado F; Hou JY; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 134(6):1132-1143. PubMed ID: 31764721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.
    Brandt B; Levin G; Leitao MM
    Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 35167007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.