135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38787021)
21. Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of full field digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis using BIRADS score in a tertiary cancer care hospital.
Singla D; Chaturvedi AK; Aggarwal A; Rao SA; Hazarika D; Mahawar V
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2018; 28(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 29692539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.
Gennaro G; Toledano A; di Maggio C; Baldan E; Bezzon E; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Toffoli A; Muzzio PC
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1545-53. PubMed ID: 20033175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Granulomatous and Nongranulomatous Mastitis.
Mohindra N; Jain N; Sabaretnam M; Agrawal V; Mishra P; Chaturvedi P; Mishra A; Agarwal G
J Surg Res; 2023 Jan; 281():13-21. PubMed ID: 36108534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
Amer HA; Schmitzberger F; Ingold-Heppner B; Kussmaul J; El Tohamy MF; Tantawy HI; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fallenberg EM
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():258-264. PubMed ID: 28668424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.
Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Toledano A; Paquelet JR; Bezzon E; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC
Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2087-94. PubMed ID: 23620367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in combination with 2D mammography for the characterisation of mammographic abnormalities.
Sanmugasiva VV; Ramli Hamid MT; Fadzli F; Rozalli FI; Yeong CH; Ab Mumin N; Rahmat K
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20628. PubMed ID: 33244075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Frequency and Outcomes of BI-RADS Category 3 Assessments in Patients With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Offit LR; Chikarmane SA; Lacson RC; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Sep; 221(3):313-322. PubMed ID: 37095672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcome of Architectural Distortion Detected Only at Breast Tomosynthesis versus 2D Mammography.
Alshafeiy TI; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Nicholson BT; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29584593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.
Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Hahn SY; Shin JH; Kim MJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2538-46. PubMed ID: 26628063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
